ITAT Quashes Reassessment Notices Without Following Section 148A Procedure:

Notices but emailed on 01.04.2021 held invalid; assessments set aside for breach of post–Finance Act 2021 safeguards
ITAT Quashes Reassessment Notices Without Section 148A Compliance

ITAT Quashes Reassessment Notices Without Following Section 148A Procedure
M/s. Desu Enterprises and Shri Thalla Srisailam Goud challenged reassessment orders for AYs 2015-16 and 2013-14 passed under Section 147 pursuant to notices under Section 148 dated 31.03.2021. However, Income Tax portal records and email logs showed that the notices were actually issued and communicated on 01.04.2021.
The Assessing Officer did not follow the mandatory pre-notice procedure under Section 148A, which became effective from 01.04.2021 under the Finance Act, 2021.
Main Issue: Whether a reassessment notice communicated on 01.04.2021, though dated 31.03.2021, is governed by the amended reassessment regime requiring compliance with Section 148A.
ITAT's Order: The Hon'ble ITAT held that for the purposes of Sections 148 and 149, the decisive date is the date on which the notice is actually issued or communicated electronically to the assessee, and not the date printed on the notice or its internal generation on the ITBA portal. Since the notices in question were communicated on 01.04.2021, they were governed by the substituted reassessment provisions introduced by the Finance Act, 2021.
The Tribunal observed that compliance with Section 148A is mandatory under the new regime and that the Assessing Officer had admittedly not followed the prescribed procedure before issuing the reassessment notices. This non-compliance rendered the notices invalid in law.
Thus, the Tribunal held that the notices under Section 148 were void ab initio and quashed the later reassessment orders passed under Section 147. Having decided the appeals on the jurisdictional issue, the Tribunal left all other grounds, including those on the merits of the additions, open.
Both appeals were allowed in full.
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2195My Recent Articles
- ITAT Deletes Section 271E Penalty on Genuine Cash Repayment Between SpousesPremium
- ITAT Allows Withdrawal of Income Tax Appeal After Assessee Pays Tax DemandPremium
- ITAT Condones Decade-Long Delay Citing Consistency in Appellate ProceedingsPremium
- ITAT Quashes Reassessment for Failure to Issue Mandatory Section 143(2) NoticePremium
- ITAT Quashes Section 153C Assessments Without Incriminating Material For Completed YearsPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








