ITAT Quashes Rs. 418 Crore Share Premium Addition for Hero Fincorp: Non-Resident Clause Clarified:

ITAT Quashes Rs. 418 Crore Share Premium Addition for Hero Fincorp: Non-Resident Clause Clarified

ITAT Delhi holds that Section 56(2)(viib) does not apply to share issues made to non-resident investors

ITAT Delhi Deletes Rs. 418 Cr Share Premium Addition for Hero Fincorp

authorMeetu KumaridateJan 21, 2026
Last update on Jan 21, 2026
ITAT Quashes Rs. 418 Crore Share Premium Addition for Hero Fincorp: Non-Resident Clause Clarified Hero Fincorp Ltd., a finance company, filed its return for AY 2017-18, declaring income of about Rs. 280 crore. During the year, it issued equity shares at a premium of Rs. 510.30 per share to two foreign investors. The Assessing Officer rejected the company’s DCF valuation, reworked the share value at Rs. 210 per share, and made an addition of ₹418.66 crore under Section 56(2)(viib).
NFRA Cracks Down on Audit File Lapses: 60-Day Completion Rule, 7-Day Submission Deadline, Many More
Thereafter, accepting that the provision applies only to shares issued to residents, the AO rectified the order under Section 154 and deleted the addition. However, the NFAC treated the rectification as non-est and restored the addition, alleging round-tripping. Main Issue: Whether Section 56(2)(viib) can be applied where share premium is received from non-resident investors, and whether NFAC could ignore a valid rectification order passed by the AO under Section 154. Tribunal Ruled: The ITAT, after a reference to a Third Member, ruled in favour of Hero Fincorp. The Tribunal held that Section 56(2)(viib) clearly applies only when shares are issued to residents, and since the investors were undisputedly non-residents, the provision had no application.
NFRA Cracks Down on Audit File Lapses: 60-Day Completion Rule, 7-Day Submission Deadline, Many More
The Tribunal further held that once the AO himself deleted the addition through a rectification order, the Revenue ceased to be an aggrieved party, and NFAC had no jurisdiction to revive the addition. Therefore, the Rs. 418.66 crore addition was fully deleted, though a minor issue relating to collection charges was remanded for fresh examination. To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

LinkedIn

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2264
Up Next

Loading suggestions…