ITAT Restricts Stock Addition to Rs. 19.46 Lakh; Survey Working Found Inflated:

Excess jewellery stock to be taxed only to extent actually reconciled and already offered in return
ITAT: Only Actual Excess Stock Taxable; Survey Difference Cannot Be Arbitrarily Added

ITAT Restricts Stock Addition to Rs. 19.46 Lakh; Survey Working Found Inflated
The assessee, a jeweller trading as Sharada Jewellers, was subjected to survey on 02.08.2017. During the survey, physical stock of gold and silver jewellery was inventorised and compared with the book stock computed on provisional figures, as the return for AY 2017-18 had not yet been filed. The survey team determined a stock difference of Rs. 54,69,543.
The assessee reconciled the figures and worked out actual excess stock at Rs. 19,46,342, which was offered in the return. However, in reassessment under Section 147, the Assessing Officer treated the entire Rs. 54,69,543 as unexplained investment under Section 69. The CIT(A) upheld the addition. Before the Tribunal, the assessee confined the challenge to the Section 69 addition.
Main Issue: Whether the entire survey difference of Rs. 54,69,543 was taxable under Section 69 or only the reconciled excess of Rs. 19,46,342 already offered by the assessee.
ITAT Ruled: The Tribunal noted that at the time of survey, the return for the earlier year had not been filed and stock figures were provisional. The audited financials later showed closing stock of Rs. 90,19,955 as on 31.03.2017, which had been accepted by the Department. Once correct opening stock was adopted, the working of stock as on the survey date showed an actual excess of only Rs. 19,46,342.
The Tribunal observed that this amount had already been offered by the assessee in his return, even though such return was treated as invalid. The Assessing Officer had computed income starting from the returned figure, which already included this excess stock.
Therefore, the Tribunal held that the further addition of Rs. 54,69,543 was unsustainable. The AO was directed to restrict the addition to Rs. 19,46,342 only. The appeal was partly allowed.
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2235My Recent Articles
- ITAT Allows Section 54F Relief Without Completion Certificate for New House ConstructionPremium
- HC Sets Aside GST Registration Revocation Rejection Over Procedural Lapse.Premium
- ITAT Upholds Deletion of Bogus Purchase Additions Lacking Search EvidencePremium
- High Court Refuses GST Writ, Directs Appeal Against Fake ITC DemandPremium
- ITAT Restricts Bogus Purchase Addition to 1.15% Profit Element Despite Seller DenialsPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








