ITAT: Transfer Pricing Margin Must Exclude Goodwill Amortization From Slump Sale:

ITAT held that amortization of goodwill arising from slump sale should be treated as an extraordinary expense and excluded while computing PLI under TNMM for transfer pricing
Tribunal Treats Amortization As Extraordinary Non Operating Expense For PLI

ITAT: Transfer Pricing Margin Must Exclude Goodwill Amortization From Slump Sale
The assessee, Bergen Engines (India) (P) Ltd., engaged in supplying spare parts and equipment used in engine-based power plants and oil and gas systems, operated only for a short period during AY 2012-13 (4 February 2012 to 31 March 2012). The dispute related to a transfer pricing adjustment on purchase of traded goods from its Associated Enterprises. In an earlier round, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal had remanded the matter to verify whether amortization of goodwill of Rs. 1.99 crore arising from a slump sale should be treated as an extraordinary item while computing the Profit Level Indicator under the TNMM method.
During fresh proceedings, the TPO recomputed the adjustment at Rs. 64.14 lakh. The Dispute Resolution Panel rejected the assessee’s claim, interpreting the earlier Tribunal order as disallowing the goodwill adjustment. Aggrieved, the assessee again appealed before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
Issue Raised: Whether amortization of goodwill arising from a slump sale should be treated as an extraordinary/non-operating expense while computing the Profit Level Indicator under TNMM.
Tribunal Held: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal partly allowed the appeal. It held that the lower authorities had misinterpreted the earlier directions of the Tribunal. The Bench clarified that the earlier order had recognized goodwill amortization as an extraordinary expense affecting profitability and had remanded the matter only to verify whether depreciation had been claimed on such goodwill.
Accordingly, the Tribunal directed the AO/TPO to treat the goodwill amortization as a non-operating/extraordinary expense while computing the PLI for transfer pricing purposes. The issue of penalty initiation under Section 271(1)(c) was held to be premature and was dismissed.
To Read Full Order, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2157My Recent Articles
- ITAT Restricts Addition to Commission on Accommodation Cash Deposit TransactionsPremium
- ITAT Grants Relief on BSNL VRS Compensation and Leave Encashment ExemptionPremium
- ITAT Restores Charitable Trust's 12AB Registration Application After CIT(E) Rejects It for Non-Filing of DocumentsPremium
- Bombay High Court Quashes Time-Barred Reassessment Notice for AY 2015-16Premium
- ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition Accepting Deceased Father’s Lifetime Cash SavingsPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








