ITC cannot be reversed solely on ground that GST registration of supplier was canceled with retrospective effect [Read Order]:
![ITC cannot be reversed solely on ground that GST registration of supplier was canceled with retrospective effect [Read Order]](https://assets.studycafe.in/uploads/2024/02/ITC-cannot-be-reversed-solely-on-ground-that-GST-registration-of-supplier-was-canceled-with-retrospective-effect.jpg)
The Madras HC held that ITC cannot be reversed solely on ground that GST registration of supplier was canceled with retrospective effect.
ITC cannot be reversed solely
![ITC cannot be reversed solely on ground that GST registration of supplier was canceled with retrospective effect [Read Order]](https://assets.studycafe.in/uploads/2024/02/ITC-cannot-be-reversed-solely-on-ground-that-GST-registration-of-supplier-was-canceled-with-retrospective-effect.jpg)
ITC cannot be reversed solely on ground that GST registration of supplier was canceled with retrospective effect [Read Order]
In the matter of M/s. Engineering Tools Corporation vs. the Assistant Commissioner (ST) [Writ Petition No.3505 of 2024 and W.M.P.Nos.3758 & 3759 of 2024] dated 15.02.2024, the Madras High Court has directed that the claim of Input Tax Credit (ITC) cannot be solely rejected on the ground that the supplier's GST registration was cancelled with retrospective effect.
Facts of the Case:
The petitioner asserts that he had purchased goods in 2017-2018 and that such purchases are supported by tax invoices, e-way bills, transport documents and proof of payment to the supplier through regular banking channels. In spite of submitting all these documents, it is stated that the ITC was reversed solely on the ground that the registration of the petitioner's supplier was cancelled with retrospective effect.
Observation of the Court:
The petitioner purchased goods in 2017-2018 and, at the highest, the petitioner may be called upon to produce evidence of the existence of the supplier at the relevant point of time.
In addition, the petitioner may be called upon to prove that the transaction was genuine by providing relevant documents such as tax invoices, e-way bills, lorry receipts, delivery challans, proof for payment and the like. In the case at hand, it appears that the petitioner submitted such documents but these documents were disregarded.
The assessing officer is directed to consider whether the transaction was genuine by examining all relevant documents in that regard. The ITC claim shall not be rejected upon such reconsideration solely on the ground that the supplier's GST registration was cancelled with retrospective effect.
Order of Court
Hence, the impugned assessment order was quashed and the matter was remanded for reconsideration.
For Official Judgment Download PDF Given Below:
About Author

CA Pratibha Goyal
Co Founder
CA Pratibha Goyal is Chartered Accountant qualified in 2016, is a Member of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India having wide experience in the field of Auditing, Taxation, ROC, GST and Secretarial matters etc.
She has written over a thousand articles & has made several videos on topics related to Auditing & Taxation. As a Speaker she has delivered various sessions on various branches of NIRC of ICAI.
Studycafe
New Delhi, Delhi, India
1486My Recent Articles
- Biggest Labour Reform in Indian History: 4 Labour Codes Effective from today
- Tax Audit and ITR Due date not extended in this case: Know More
- Government notifies Agreement and Protocol between India and Qatar [Read Notification]
- CA Breaking: Results of ICAI Examination to be announced soon, Know probable Date
- Breaking: GSTR-3B Due Date for September 2025 extended by CBIC amid Diwali Festivities
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Tags
Recent Posts

All Posts








