Jodhpur Court Sends Two Tax Officers to Prison Over Rs 15 Lakh Bribe:

In a CBI-trapped bribery case, Two IT officials were convicted, while jeweller Chandra Prakash Katta was cleared. The officials were also fined Rs 1.10 lakh each.
Jodhpur Court Punishes Corrupt Income Tax Officials

Jodhpur Court Sends Two Tax Officers to Prison Over Rs 15 Lakh Bribe
In Jodhpur, a special CBI court on Friday gave two Income Tax officials four years in jail for taking a bribe of Rs. 15 lakh. The court cleared the jeweller, who was accused of being the middleman. Besides jail, the officials were also told to pay a fine of Rs. 1.10 lakh each.
Delivering the judgement, President Officer Bhupendra Sanadhya observed that the actions of the officials constituted serious corruption, undermining public trust in government institutions according to the court order.
This case goes back to March 2015, when then-Chief Income Tax Commissioner Pawan Kumar Sharma and Inspector Shailendra Bhandari were arrested along with jeweller Chandra Prakash Katta after Barmer businessman Kishore Jain approached the CBI. He claimed that income tax officials had wrongly increased his tax for the year 2012-13 from Rs. 2.5 crore to Rs. 12 crore and then asked him for a bribe to resolve the issue.
The bribe was first set at Rs. 25 lakh but later reduced to Rs. 23 lakh after negotiations. Jain, who had already won a favourable decision at the Commissioner of Appeals, said he continued to face pressure from senior officials even after the ruling.
After his complaint, the CBI set a trap. On March 31, 2015, Bhandari was caught taking Rs. 15 lakh at Katta's showroom. Investigators said the money was for Sharma, and all three were arrested.
The two officials and the jeweller were charged under Section 120B of the IPC and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Katta was later acquitted because there wasn’t enough evidence against him.
The CBI also raided eight of Sharma’s properties across the country and filed a separate case against him for having assets worth crores that didn’t match his income, including land and other valuable items.
About Author
Vanshika verma
Content Writer
Vanshika Verma is a Content Writer with 1+ year of experience at Studycafe.in. A B.Com graduate from Delhi University, She writes articles on Finance, Tax, ICAI, GST, and the latest financial news, with a focus on making complex topics easy for readers and professionals.
Vanshika Verma is a Content Writer with 1+ year of experience at Studycafe.in. A B.Com graduate from Delhi University, She writes articles on Finance, Tax, ICAI, GST, and the latest financial news, with a focus on making complex topics easy for readers and professionals.
Studycafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
1637My Recent Articles
- ITAT Remands Rs 38.98 Crore Unexplained Cash Deposit Dispute to AO for Fresh VerificationPremium
- ITAT Allows Fresh Opportunity in Dispute Over Suppressed Sales and Commission ExpensesPremium
- ITAT Deletes Rs 2.13 Crore Addition Under Section 68, Grants Major Tax ReliefPremium
- ITAT: Protective Addition Cannot Survive After Substantive Assessment Is QuashedPremium
- ITAT Remands Rs 8.12 Crore Cash Withdrawal Disallowance Case to AO for Fresh AssessmentPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…









