Life Insurance and Income Tax: When Does Section 10(10D) Exemption Not Apply?:

Section 10(10D) exemption on life insurance maturity is denied if premiums exceed specified limits, making the payout taxable under Section 56(2)(xiii). Know these limits.
When Life Insurance Maturity Becomes Taxable Under Section 56(2)(xiii)

Life Insurance and Income Tax: When Does Section 10(10D) Exemption Not Apply?
Normally, when an individual receives the sum of a life insurance policy, it is the sum of the assured amount and the bonus. The sum is exempt from tax under Section 10(10D). Meaning, the person is not required to pay any income tax on that amount. However, many times exemption is not applicable under this section under certain conditions. This amount becomes taxable when Section 56(2)(xiii) applies.
Section 56(2)(xiii) of the Income Tax Act deals with how the amount received from a life insurance policy is taxed, especially when the usual exemption under Section 10(10D) is not available. Section 56(2)(xiii) applies from Assessment Year 2024-25 onwards.
There are three specific situations where Section 56(2)(xiii) does not apply, and the amount is either taxable under a different section or completely exempt:
If the annual premium limit stays within the aforementioned limit, the entire maturity amount is tax-free under Section 10(10D). If the annual premium exceeds the above limits during the policy term, then the amount will be taxable, except in the case of death (fully exempted).
If the life insurance policy was taken before April 01, 2003, nothing is taxable, even if the premium was very high. These old policies are fully exempt.
- Unit Linked Insurance Policies (ULIPs): If the sum of the life insurance is received under a Unit Linked Insurance Policy (ULIP) and it is not exempt under section 10(10D), it is taxable as capital gains under Section 45. Therefore, Section 56(2)(xiii) is not applicable in this case.
- Keyman Insurance Policies: If the sum of the life insurance is received under a Keyman insurance policy, the amount received is taxable under Section 15 (if paid as salary), Section 28 (if it is business income), or Section 56(2)(iv) (in other cases). Therefore, Section 56(2)(xiii) is not applicable in this case.
- On Death of the Policyholder: If the sum of the life insurance is received on the death of a person, nothing is taxable, even if it is a ULIP, keyman policy, or any other life insurance policy. The reason behind this is that Section 10(10D) allows full exemption on death benefits.
| Date of Policy Issue | Premium Limit Beyond Which 10(10D) Exemption is Denied |
| Between 01-Apr-2003 and 31-Mar-2012 | If the premium in any year exceeds 20% of the sum assured |
| Between 01-Apr-2012 and 31-Mar-2023 | If the premium in any year exceeds 10% of the sum assured |
| On or after 01-Apr-2013 (for persons with disability – Sec 80U – or specified disease – Sec 80DDB) | If the premium in any year exceeds 15% of the sum assured |
| On or after 01-Apr-2023 | If the premium in any year exceeds ₹5,00,000, or 10% of the sum assured (whichever condition applies) |
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2587My Recent Articles
- Rs 1.48 Crore Interest on Delayed Property Payments Qualifies as Cost of Acquisition: ITAT DelhiPremium
- ROC Penalises Company and Director Rs 20,000 for Wrong AGM Date in Form AOC-4CFSPremium
- ROC Penalises Company's Eight Directors Over Non-Appointment of Two Independent Directors for FY 2015-16 to 2018-19Premium
- An Inadvertent Typographical Error in Tax Audit Report Should Not Lead to An Unmerited Disallowance, Rules ITATPremium
- 21 CBI Officials Honoured With President’s Medals for Distinguished and Meritorious Service on 80th Independence Day
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Tags
No tags yet.
Recent Posts
All Posts
Tags
No tags yet.







