Mere Expense Disallowance Cannot Trigger Section 271(1)(c) Penalty; ITAT Partly Allows Appeal:
ITAT partly deletes Rs 10.48 lakh penalty, ruling that mere disallowance of expenses does not automatically justify penalty under Section 271(1)(c).
ITAT Deletes Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) on TDS Disallowance
Saloni Kumari
Aug 22, 2026Premium
Mere Expense Disallowance Cannot Trigger Section 271(1)(c) Penalty; ITAT Partly Allows Appeal
ITAT partly deletes Rs 10.48 lakh penalty, ruling that mere disallowance of expenses does not automatically justify penalty under Section 271(1)(c).
Also Read
ITAT Upholds Rs 10 Lakh Addition Under Section 68 as Unexplained Cash Credit Over Failure to Prove Lenders’ CreditworthinessITAT Rules Reassessment Proceedings Invalid After Finding Section 148 Notice Issued Beyond Three Years Without Meeting Rs 50 Lakh Escaped-Income ThresholdITAT Rules Reassessment Notice Issued by ITO Invalid for Taxpayer With Income Above Rs 20 Lakh, Holds Proceedings Void Ab InitioITAT Rules Bank Loan Principal Waiver Not Taxable Under Sections 28(iv) or 41(1)
About Author
Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2622My Recent Articles
- ROC: Company and Directors Faces Penalty for Not Having Any Office at Registered Location of BusinessPremium
- ROC Imposes Penalty on Company and Director for Failure to Furnish Financial Statements for FY 2021-22
- ICSI Seeks Further Extension of CCFS 2026 Beyond August 31 Amid Technical Issues on MCA-21 Portal
- ICSI Submits Follow-Up Representation to MCA, Seeks Resolution of 17 Key Issues to Improve MCA-21 Compliance
- GSTAT Quashes Rs 1.38 Lakh E-Way Bill Penalty, Holds Penalty Order Beyond 7-Day Limit Under Section 129(3) Is Illegal Premium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts