Mere payment by account payee cheque & deduction of TDS does not mean that transaction is genuine: ITAT

Mere payment by account payee cheque & deduction of TDS does not mean that transaction is genuine: ITAT

Mere payment by account payee cheque & deduction of TDS does not mean that transaction is genuine: ITAT Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in t…

authorCA Pratibha GoyaldateDec 12, 2022
Last update on Dec 12, 2022
Mere payment by account payee cheque & deduction of TDS does not mean that transaction is genuine: ITAT Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in the matter of Bhagwab Mahavir Education Foundation vs DCIT retreated that it is important to mention that in various case laws it has been held that "mere payment by account payee cheque is not sacrosanct nor can it make a non-genuine transaction genuine "[Precision Finance Pvt. Ltd. vs. CIT - 208 ITR 465 (Cal).]". The burden of proof as to any particular fact lies on that person who wishes the court to believe in its existence. Moreover, the fact that TDS has been deducted, does not mean that transaction is genuine, ITAT observed from the order of ld. CIT(A) that assessee-trust has failed to furnish certain evidences and documents before the lower authorities, ITAT noted that assessee did not submit copy of the bank account in respect of certain parties, as noted by ld CIT(A) above, therefore loan transactions stood unverified. The assessee had filed the relevant page of its bank account which reflected the deposit of cheque of Rs.20,00,000/- on 31.03.2010 and prior to this date, there was cash withdrawal of Rs.24,50,000/- on 30.03.2010. No details in the form of copy of ITR-V filed. Since the bank book has not been furnished during the course of appellate proceedings, the veracity of this cash fund so withdrawn could not be explained. ITAT was of the view that one more opportunity should be given to the assessee-trust to plead his case and furnish these documents and details before the ld. CIT(A). Therefore, it was deemed and proper to set aside the order of the CIT(A) and remit the matter back to the file of the ld. CIT(A) to adjudicate the issue afresh on merits. Click here to read the Order

About Author

CA Pratibha Goyal

Co Founder

CA Pratibha Goyal is Chartered Accountant qualified in 2016, is a Member of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India having wide experience in the field of Auditing, Taxation, ROC, GST and Secretarial matters etc. She has written over a thousand articles & has made several videos on topics related to Auditing & Taxation. As a Speaker she has delivered various sessions on various branches of NIRC of ICAI.
Studycafe
New Delhi, Delhi, India
1486
Up Next

Loading suggestions…