No MCC Bar on Film Releases: Madras HC Dismisses Plea Against ‘Dhurandhar 2’ Screening in Tamil Nadu:

The Madras HC ruled that the Model Code of Conduct does not prohibit film releases, dismissing the plea to halt Dhurandhar 2 in Tamil Nadu due to lack of challenge to its CBFC certification.
HC Says It Cannot Intervene in Matter Until Film's CBFC Certification is Directly Challenged

No MCC Bar on Film Releases: Madras HC Dismisses Plea Against ‘Dhurandhar 2’ Screening in Tamil Nadu
The Madras High Court has rejected two writ petitions requesting a temporary stay on the screening of Dhurandhar 2: The Revenge in Tamil Nadu theatres, flagging that it might violate the Model Code of Conduct (rules set by the Election Commission of India) during the time leading up to the Assembly elections.
The aforementioned decision has been announced by a bench comprising the honourable chief justice SA Dharmadhikari and justice G. Arul Murugan, on the grounds that the law does not include any such provisions to bar the release of any film in a particular area during the MCC period. The court held that it cannot intervene in the matter until the film's certification, granted by the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) is not challenged and in the present case, the same has not been challenged by the petitioner, D. Rakesh, a resident of Madurai.
The high court held, 'What is the law that a movie cannot be released when the Model Code of Conduct is in place?' The CBFC has given a certificate. It is not challenged. Unless that is challenged, nothing can be done. The statutory body has permitted." The court has asserted that it will release a detailed order in the present case later; presently it has dismissed the plea.
In the present case, the petitioner had claimed that the release of the film Dhurandhar 2: The Revenge in Tamil Nadu theatres when the Assembly elections are almost about to start in the state will contravene the spirit of the MCC, especially Chapter VII of the MCC guidelines. The provisions of the pointed-out chapter restrict the ruling party from using public funds or official media for gaining publicity that can influence voters during elections. Rakesh argued that even though the said clause discusses the “public exchequer” (government fund), its real aim is broader; it is meant to stop political parties from using mass media to indirectly promote themselves during elections.
According to the petitioner, the movie "Dhurandhar 2" has shown achievements gained by the ruling party, especially in fighting terrorism and money laundering; hence, the movie might influence people's votes during assembly elections. Consequently, he prayed the court to direct filmmakers Aditya Dhar and Lokesh Dhar and producer Jyoti Deshpande to stop the screening of Dhurandhar 2 in Tamil Nadu until May 04 (conclusion of assembly elections vote counting).
However, the high court in its final ruling held that it cannot release any directions regarding the halting of the film's screening in tamil nadu, until the film's CBFC certification is directly challenged. Further highlighted that MCC promotes none of such provisions that directly restrict film releases.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2389My Recent Articles
- ITAT Remands Section 69 Unexplained Cash Credit Addition After Bank Statement Was Not ExaminedPremium
- ITAT Remands Transfer Pricing Dispute: DRP to Reassess Comparables and Working Capital AdjustmentPremium
- CBDT Notifies TDS Exemption on Aircraft Lease Payments to IFSC Units Under 20-Year Tax Deduction Scheme Premium
- CBDT Grants TDS Exemption On Ship Leasing Payments To IFSC Units Under 20-Year Tax Deduction SchemePremium
- ITAT Remands Case to CIT(A) After Admitting Crucial Sale Deed as Additional Evidence
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








