Non-Appointment of Whole-Time Company Secretary Costs BMW Ventures Limited and its Directors Rs 13.28 lakh Penalty:

The Registrar of Companies (ROC) Patna, has imposed penalty of Rs 13.28 lakh on BMW Ventures Limited and its Directors for non-compliance with the mandataory provision for appointment of Company Secretary
Non-compliance With Section 203(5) Led to Penalty

Non-Appointment of Whole-Time Company Secretary Costs BMW Ventures Limited and its Directors Rs 13.28 lakh Penalty
The Registrar of Patna (ROC) has passed an adjudication order under Section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013 against BMW Ventures Limited for violation of Section 203(5) relating to the appointment of a Company Secretary within the stipulated time given in the statute after the increase in the paid-up capital of the company.
On 4th of November 2016, had the paid-up share capital of Rs 10.55 crore, and it had not appointed Company Secretary which is a statutory requisite after crossing the prescribed paid-up capital threshold following a 6-month time period up to May 4, 2017 to effect the compliance but the company delayed the appointment to the month of August in 2017 and caused an unexplained delay of 88 days. On May 18 2026, a representation hearing was conducted and the representative of the company admitted that there was a delay of 88 days.
The Adjudicating Officer exercised the powers under Section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013 and confirmed the default in compliance without any exemption. The total finance penalty imposed was Rs 13,28 lakhs including the penalty of Rs 500000 on BMW Ventures Limited and Rs 138000 on its directors named Bijay kumar Kishorepuria, Nitin Kishorepuriya, Sabita Devi Kishorepuriya, Rachna Kishorepuriya, Navneet Ranjan and Rachita Kedia.
An appeal against this adjudication can be structured and filed with the Regional Director (RD), Kolkata, within sixty days.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2729My Recent Articles
- Max Healthcare Faces NCLT Proceedings Over Kalinga Hospital; Next Hearing Scheduled for Sept 28
- Mere Assumptions Cannot Sustain Addition: Rs 15.72 Lakh Cash Addition Deleted After ITAT Finds No Incriminating EvidencePremium
- ITAT Allows Normal Tax Rate on Rs 75 Lakh Survey Surrender, Rejects 60% Section 115BBE LevyPremium
- HC Sets Aside Ex Parte Adjudication Order After SCN Merely Uploaded on GST Portal under 'Additional Notice and Orders' TabPremium
- ITAT Sets Aside Section 263 Revision Order After PCIT Lacked Jurisdiction to Revise Issue Already Considered by CIT(A)Premium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts









