Patna HC quashed orders passed ex-parte without providing fair opportunity of hearing to the petitioner

Patna HC quashed orders passed ex-parte without providing fair opportunity of hearing to the petitioner

Patna HC quashed orders passed ex-parte without providing fair opportunity of hearing to the petitioner In Rambabu Singh v. State of Bihar [Civil Wri…

authorA2ZBimal JaindateSep 8, 2021
Last update on Sep 8, 2021
Patna HC quashed orders passed ex-parte without providing fair opportunity of hearing to the petitioner In Rambabu Singh v. State of Bihar [Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14475 of 2021 dated August 26, 2021], Rambabu Singh ("the Petitioner") filed the petitions to quash- two orders dated February 03, 2020; two order dated March 05, 2020 and one order dated December 28, 2020 (“the Orders”) passed by Additional Commissioner of State Tax ("the Respondent") as the Orders were passed ex-parte and no fair opportunity of hearing was accorded to the Petitioner. The Respondent counsel submitted that he has no objection if the matter is remanded to the Assessing Authority for deciding the case afresh. Further, contended that, the case shall be decided on merits. Furthermore, assured that during pendency of the case, no coercive steps shall be taken against the Petitioner. On perusal of all the facts and evidences the Honorable Patna High Court adjudicated that the Orders passed by the Respondent are bad in law. The Court gave two reasons- (a) violation of principles of natural justice, as fair opportunity of hearing was not provided to the Petitioner; (b) the Order passed ex-parte do not assign any sufficient reasons, as to how the officer determined the amount due and payable by the Petitioner. On such context, the Orders were quashed by the Honorable Patna High Court. DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and A2Z Taxcorp LLP. The contents of this article are solely for informational purpose and for the reader’s personal non-commercial use. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the author nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Further, no portion of our article or newsletter should be used for any purpose(s) unless authorized in writing and we reserve a legal right for any infringement on usage of our article or newsletter without prior permission.

About Author

A2ZBimal Jain

Chartered Accountant

CA Bimal Jain is a Member of Institute of Chartered Accountants of India since May 1994 and Member of Institute of Company Secretaries of India since December 2006 along with a Bachelors degree in Law. Also, he is a Qualified SAP - FI/CO Consultant and has more than 21 years of experience in Indirect Taxation and specializes in all aspects of Service Tax, Value Added Tax (VAT)/ Central Sales Tax (CST), Central Excise, Customs, Foreign Trade Policy (FTP), Special Economic Zone (SEZ), Export Oriented Unit (EOU), Export-Import Laws and well acquainted with the concept and impact of way forward Goods and Services tax (GST).
A2Z Taxcorp LLP
Delhi, Delhi, India
468
Up Next

Loading suggestions…