Provisions of Section 16(2)(c) of CGST Act challenged before Tripura HC

Provisions of Section 16(2)(c) of CGST Act challenged before Tripura HC

CA Bimal Jain | Aug 21, 2021 |

Provisions of Section 16(2)(c) of CGST Act challenged before Tripura HC

Provisions of Section 16(2)(c) of CGST Act challenged before Tripura HC

The Hon’ble High Court of Tripura in Re: Sahil Enterprises v. Union of India [WP(C) NO. 531 Of 2021 dated August 09, 2021] issued notice for the limited purpose of removing attachment of Input Tax Credit (“ITC”) ledger of assessee.

Facts:

Sahil Enterprises (“the Petitioner”) has submitted that their ITC account is attached by Department on the ground that, supplier has not deposited the taxes and hence the Petitioner was not eligible to ITC in terms of Section 16(2)(c) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“the CGST Act”). The Petitioner has challenged the provisions contained under Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST Act, which states that, registered person shall be entitled to ITC only if the tax charged in respect of such supply has been actually paid to the Government by the supplier either in cash or through utilisation of ITC admissible in respect of the said supply.

The Petitioner contends that after paying taxes to the seller at the time of purchases, the Petitioner has no control over the seller to ensure that such tax is deposited with the Government. Denying ITC to the Petitioner where they have already paid tax would amount to double taxation.

Further, the provision contained in Section 16(2)(c) of CGST Act is in violation of Articles 14 [i.e., the State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India], 19(1)(g) [i.e., all citizens shall have right to practice any profession, or to carry on any occupation, trade or business] and 300A [i.e., persons not to be deprived of property save by authority of law] of the Constitution of India.

Held:

The Hon’ble High Court of Tripura in Re: Sahil Enterprises v. Union of India WP(C) NO. 531 Of 2021 dated August 09, 2021 held that, the issue require consideration. Since legislation framed by the Parliament is under challenge, issued notice to the learned Attorney General.

Learned Asstt. Solicitor General and learned counsel Mr. Paramartha Datta waived notice on behalf of Respondents. For the limited purpose of considering the Petitioner’s request for interim relief for removing attachment of the ITC ledger, issued notice returnable on August 23, 2021.

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and A2Z Taxcorp LLP. The contents of this article are solely for informational purpose. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the author nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

StudyCafe Membership

Join StudyCafe Membership. For More details about Membership Click Join Membership Button
Join Membership

In case of any Doubt regarding Membership you can mail us at [email protected]

Join Studycafe's WhatsApp Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Government Job, Sarkari Naukri, Private Jobs, Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"




Author Bio
My Recent Articles
Actions taken by the department during enquiry need not necessarily be termed as harassment Who are liable to generate e-invoice w.e.f October 1, 2022 Personal penalty cannot be imposed on the Chairman of the Company for failure in ensuring proper accounting of the goods Stayed the order of cancellation of GST Registration of the assessee for continuing the trading activities Can CA be arrested- Section 69 vs Section 132 of the CGST ActView All Posts