GST Officer penalised by court for passing adverse order without giving opportunity of hearing:

GST Officer penalised by court for passing adverse order without giving opportunity of hearing

GST Officer penalised with cost of Rs. 20,000 by court for passing adverse order u/s 74 without giving opportunity of hearing

GST order passed without giving opportunity of hearing

authorCA Pratibha GoyaldateApr 21, 2025
Last update on Apr 21, 2025
Another Systematic Failure was observed by the Court where the GST order u/s 74 was passed without giving the opportunity of hearing The petitioner is engaged in manufacture and supply of potato flakes besides other items. A show cause notice dated 03.08.2024 for the period July 2017 to March 2018, proposing to classify the product in question i.e. potato flakes under tariff heading 2005-2000 instead of 1105-2000 was issued. In the notice, date by which the reply was required to be submitted was indicated as 19.08.2024 and in column pertaining to date of personal hearing ‘NA’ was indicated and the same was the position pertaining to column pertaining to time of personal hearing. A reply to the notice dated 03.08.2024 was filed by the petitioner through counsel on 19.08.2024 contesting the allegations made therein. In the reply, a specific prayer was made on behalf of the petitioner that no adverse order to the prejudice of the petitioner be passed without affording him an opportunity of hearing. However, by the order impugned dated 04.02.2025, without affording any opportunity of hearing, the demand has been created. The main issue here is whether the impugned order dated 04.02.2025 is liable to be quashed for violation of Section 75(4) of the CGST Act, 2017, due to the denial of opportunity of personal hearing. No justification was there with the state for the denial of hearing under Section 75(4). As per court, the impugned order dated 04.02.2025 was held to be in gross violation of Section 75(4) of the CGST Act, Principles of natural justice and Binding High Court precedent in Laskin Engineering Pvt. Ltd. v. State of U.P. (Writ Tax No. 674 of 2024). The Court noted a systemic failure, observing that officers were mechanically denying hearings, setting conflicting dates, and ignoring electronic records and specific hearing requests. Court finally allowed the writ, imposing a cost of Rs. 20,000/- on the Joint Commissioner SGST to be deposited with the High Court Legal Services Committee within four weeks.

About Author

CA Pratibha Goyal

Co Founder

CA Pratibha Goyal is Chartered Accountant qualified in 2016, is a Member of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India having wide experience in the field of Auditing, Taxation, ROC, GST and Secretarial matters etc. She has written over a thousand articles & has made several videos on topics related to Auditing & Taxation. As a Speaker she has delivered various sessions on various branches of NIRC of ICAI.
Studycafe
New Delhi, Delhi, India
1486
Up Next

Loading suggestions…