Quashed the Assessment Order passed without providing an opportunity of hearing to Assessee

Quashed the Assessment Order passed without providing an opportunity of hearing to Assessee

Quashed the Assessment Order passed without providing an opportunity of hearing to Assessee In Jaffaorulla Syeaadunnishaa v. The Assistant Commission…

authorA2ZBimal JaindateAug 4, 2021
Last update on Aug 4, 2021
Quashed the Assessment Order passed without providing an opportunity of hearing to Assessee In Jaffaorulla Syeaadunnishaa v. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Income Tax Circle 2(1) Trichy, 3rd Floor, Trichy Main Building, Williams Road, Cantonment, Tiruchirappalli-620 001. W.P (MD) No.1972 of 2020 and WMP(MD)Nos.1645 and 1646 of 2020, Jaffaorulla Syeaadunnishaa (“the Petitioner”) challenged an assessment order dated December 24, 2019 (“Assessment Order”) under Section 144 of the Income-tax act (“the IT Act”) for being in violation of principles of natural justice and against the Circular dated December 26, 2019. The Petitioner was issued a show cause notice dated December 5, 2019 (“SCN”) by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Tiruchirappalli (“the Respondents”) asking for details including the details for the assessment year 2016-2017 and thereafter Assessment Order was passed. The Petitioner contended that the Respondent has arbitrarily passed the assessment order on December 24, 2019 without granting the time to Petitioner to file reply to SCN as per the direction of the Directorate of Income Tax granting time upto December 29, 2019. The Hon’ble Madras High Court set aside the Assessment Order and held that the Assessment Order was wrongfully passed by the Respondent on December 24, 2019 without granting appropriate time to the Petitioner to file a reply within the time limit of December 29, 2019 as per the direction of the Directorate of Income Tax which is a clear violation of principle of natural justice. Further, the Petitioner was not even given an opportunity of personal hearing. Remitted back the matter to the Respondent to pass fresh order after giving an opportunity for making detailed reply and after affording opportunity of personal hearing to the Petitioner. DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and A2Z Taxcorp LLP. The contents of this article are solely for informational purpose. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the author nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

About Author

A2ZBimal Jain

Chartered Accountant

CA Bimal Jain is a Member of Institute of Chartered Accountants of India since May 1994 and Member of Institute of Company Secretaries of India since December 2006 along with a Bachelors degree in Law. Also, he is a Qualified SAP - FI/CO Consultant and has more than 21 years of experience in Indirect Taxation and specializes in all aspects of Service Tax, Value Added Tax (VAT)/ Central Sales Tax (CST), Central Excise, Customs, Foreign Trade Policy (FTP), Special Economic Zone (SEZ), Export Oriented Unit (EOU), Export-Import Laws and well acquainted with the concept and impact of way forward Goods and Services tax (GST).
A2Z Taxcorp LLP
Delhi, Delhi, India
468
Up Next

Loading suggestions…