RBI Imposes Monetary Penalty of 1.728 Crore on State Bank of India:

On April 29, 2025, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) imposed the monetary penalty of Rs. 1,72,80,000 on SBI for not obeying a few guidelines issued by the central bank.
RBI Enforces Monetary Penalty on SBI

RBI Imposes Monetary Penalty of 1.728 Crore on State Bank of India
On April 29, 2025, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) imposed the monetary penalty of Rs. 1,72,80,000 (Rupees One Crore Seventy Two Lakh Eighty Thousand only) on State Bank of India (SBI) for not obeying few guidelines issued by the central bank regarding ‘Loans and Advances- Statutory and Other Restrictions’, ‘Customer Protection – Limiting Liability of Customers in Unauthorised Electronic Banking Transactions’ and ‘Opening of Current Accounts by Banks - Need for Discipline’. This penalty has been imposed by the Central Bank of India due to its rights under the provisions of Section 47A(1)(c) read with Sections 46(4)(i) and 51(1) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949.
In accordance with its financial position, the RBI conducted the Statutory Inspection for Supervisory Evaluation (ISE 2023) of SBI on March 31, 2023. After finding that the bank did not follow RBI rules and reviewing related communications, the RBI sent a notice asking the bank to explain why it should not be fined for this non-compliance.
After reviewing the bank's response to the notice, along with its additional written and oral explanations, the RBI found that several violations had indeed occurred. As a result, it decided to impose a monetary penalty on the bank. These violations included:
- Giving a bridge loan to a company based on money it was expecting from the government as a subsidy or reimbursement.
- Failing to (i) return money (through shadow reversal) to customer accounts within 10 working days after customers reported unauthorised electronic transactions, and (ii) compensate some customers within 90 days of receiving their complaints;
- Opening and maintaining certain current accounts that did not follow the RBI rules.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2490My Recent Articles
- ITAT Remands TDS Appeal After CIT(A) Failed to Decide Actual CAM Charges IssuePremium
- ITAT Rules in Taxpayer's Favour, Holds Delay in Filing Form 67 Cannot Be Sole Ground to Deny Foreign Tax CreditPremium
- ITAT Revives Tax Appeals for Six AYs After Finding Insufficient Hearing Time and Ignored Adjournment RequestPremium
- ITAT Grants Fresh Opportunity to Explain Rs 2.39 Crore Demonetisation Cash Deposit Addition After Main Director’s DeathPremium
- ITAT Grants Taxpayer Fresh Opportunity to Contest Rs 44.16 Lakh Addition After Finding No Decision on MeritsPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Tags
No tags yet.
Recent Posts

All Posts

Tags
No tags yet.







