ROC Fines Company and Director Over Filing Error Under Companies Act:

ROC fined company and its director for filing incorrect financial year details in Form AOC-4 on the MCA portal under the Companies Act, 2013.
ROC Penalises Incorrect MCA Filing

ROC Fines Company and Director Over Filing Error Under Companies Act
Mahaprabhu Himghar Private Limited and its officer in default have been penalised by the Registrar of Companies (ROC) for filing wrong financial information on the MCA portal for the financial year 2023-24.
The order said the company had filed its financial statement form AOC-4 on October 1, 2024. However, the form had an error in the financial year details. The company wrongly quoted 01.04.2023 to 01.04.2024 instead of 01.04.2023 to 31.03.2024.
Later, the company itself informed the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) about the mistake by filing Form GNL-1 and requested that the earlier filing be marked as defective. The company said the mistake was made inadvertently and sought leniency from the authorities.
The ROC noted that, as per Rule 8(3) of the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014, the authorised signatory and professional certifying an e-form are responsible for ensuring the correctness of all information and attachments. Since the MCA portal is a public registry relied upon by regulators, shareholders, creditors and other stakeholders, filing of incorrect information amounts to a violation of the law.
The adjudicating officer further said that though the company subsequently sought correction of the mistake, the violation had already taken place when the incorrect form was filed. Therefore, liability under Section 450 of the Companies Act, 2013 still applied.
As a result, the ROC imposed a penalty of Rs 10,000 each on the company and the responsible signatory for contravention of Rule 8(3) read with Section 450 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Apart from this, the ROC directed the company and its officer in default to correct the defect on the MCA portal by filing the proper form and completing all required procedures within the prescribed time.
About Author
Vanshika verma
Content Writer
Vanshika Verma is a Content Writer with 1+ year of experience at Studycafe.in. A B.Com graduate from Delhi University, She writes articles on Finance, Tax, ICAI, GST, and the latest financial news, with a focus on making complex topics easy for readers and professionals.
Vanshika Verma is a Content Writer with 1+ year of experience at Studycafe.in. A B.Com graduate from Delhi University, She writes articles on Finance, Tax, ICAI, GST, and the latest financial news, with a focus on making complex topics easy for readers and professionals.
Studycafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
1642My Recent Articles
- ITAT Deletes Rs 1.24 Crore Additions Over Form 26A and Cash PaymentsPremium
- ITAT Pune Sends Tax Dispute Back to CIT(A) Over Rule 46A ViolationPremium
- ITAT Sets Aside Ex Parte Rejection of Section 12A and 80G Applications, Orders Fresh HearingPremium
- ITAT Cancels Rs 9.27 Lakh Penalty, Directs Tax Department to Grant Immunity to AssesseePremium
- ITAT Sends Cooperative Society’s Section 80P Interest Claim Back to AO for Fresh ExaminationPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








