ROC Patna Imposes Penalty for Non-Filing of FY22 Annual Return:

The ROC imposed penalties on the company and its officers for failing to file the FY22 annual return under Section 92 of the Companies Act, 2013.
ROC Patna Levies Penalty Over FY22 Compliance Lapse

ROC Patna Imposes Penalty for Non-Filing of FY22 Annual Return
The Registrar of Companies (ROC), Patna, imposed a penalty on Triumfina Sales and Services Private Limited and its officers in default for not filing the required annual return.
A complaint was received by the office stating that Triumfina Sales and Services Private Limited did not file its annual return for the financial year 2021-2022. According to the MCA portal, the company was established on December 11, 2017, and it has failed to submit the required annual return for that year.
The office also issued a notice for e-adjudication on September 26, 2025, regarding the same. A hearing was scheduled for January 6, 2026, and later rescheduled to January 21, 2026. However, no one appeared on either of the scheduled dates.
ROC observed that as of now, the Annual Return for the financial year ending March 31, 2022, has still not been filed. Therefore, it appears that the company and its directors have violated the provisions of Section 92 of the Companies Act, 2013, which requires every company to file its annual return with the MCA.
As a result, ROC imposed a Rs 64,750 penalty on the company and Rs 25,000 each on its officers in default.
About Author
Vanshika verma
Content Writer
Vanshika Verma is a Content Writer with 1+ year of experience at Studycafe.in. A B.Com graduate from Delhi University, She writes articles on Finance, Tax, ICAI, GST, and the latest financial news, with a focus on making complex topics easy for readers and professionals.
Vanshika Verma is a Content Writer with 1+ year of experience at Studycafe.in. A B.Com graduate from Delhi University, She writes articles on Finance, Tax, ICAI, GST, and the latest financial news, with a focus on making complex topics easy for readers and professionals.
Studycafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
1637My Recent Articles
- ITAT Remands Rs 38.98 Crore Unexplained Cash Deposit Dispute to AO for Fresh VerificationPremium
- ITAT Allows Fresh Opportunity in Dispute Over Suppressed Sales and Commission ExpensesPremium
- ITAT Deletes Rs 2.13 Crore Addition Under Section 68, Grants Major Tax ReliefPremium
- ITAT: Protective Addition Cannot Survive After Substantive Assessment Is QuashedPremium
- ITAT Remands Rs 8.12 Crore Cash Withdrawal Disallowance Case to AO for Fresh AssessmentPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








