SC Grants Relief in Rs. 159 Cr GST Demand Case, Allows Reduced Pre-Deposit:

Supreme Court permits partial deposit and stays coercive action in ex parte GST assessment dispute
Supreme Court Allows Reduced Pre-Deposit in Rs. 159 Cr GST Demand Case

SC Grants Relief in Rs. 159 Cr GST Demand Case, Allows Reduced Pre-Deposit
The petitioner was issued two show cause notices by the GST department proposing substantial tax demands exceeding Rs. 119 crore and Rs. 17 crore respectively. The petitioner sought access to relied upon documents to file a proper reply, which the department claimed were uploaded on a portal. However, according to the petitioner, the documents were uploaded on an inaccessible portal, preventing effective participation in the proceedings.
The department proceeded to pass ex parte assessment orders raising a total liability of approximately Rs. 159 crore including tax, interest, and penalty. The petitioner challenged the orders before the High Court, which declined to entertain the writ petition on the ground of the availability of an alternative remedy under Section 107 of the GST Act, requiring a 10% pre-deposit. The appellate authority also refused to entertain the appeal due to non-payment of the pre-deposit, leading the petitioner to approach the Supreme Court.
Main Issue: Whether relief can be granted where a statutory appeal is not entertained due to the inability to meet the pre-deposit, especially when assessment orders are alleged to be ex parte.
SC's Order: The Supreme Court granted interim relief to the petitioner by directing a deposit of Rs. 3.50 crore instead of the statutory 10% pre-deposit of approximately Rs. 6.70 crore. The Court took note of the petitioner’s contention that it was denied a fair opportunity due to non-access to crucial documents and the ex parte nature of the assessment.
Upon deposit of the directed amount within two weeks, the Court ordered issuance of notice and restrained the department from taking coercive steps pursuant to the impugned assessment orders. The matter has been kept pending for further consideration.
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2214My Recent Articles
- ITAT Condones Delay, Allows BSNL VRS Tax Exemption Under Section 10(10B)Premium
- ITAT Deletes Rs 30 Lakh Penalty Over Defective Section 274 NoticePremium
- ITAT Remands Rs 7 Lakh Addition for Fresh Verification of Loan SourcePremium
- ITAT Deletes Addition, Accepts Agricultural Income as Source of Land InvestmentPremium
- ITAT Condones 433-Day Delay, Restores Section 54F and Capital Gains IssuesPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








