Statutory Contributions of Mining Royalty Treated as Consideration Under GST: Telangana AAAR:

AAAR holds that questions not raised before AAR cannot be examined in appeal; confines decision to taxability of DMF & NMET contributions
Telangana AAAR on GST Applicability to DMF and NMET Contributions in Mining Operations

Statutory Contributions of Mining Royalty Treated as Consideration Under GST: Telangana AAAR
M/s The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, a government-owned coal mining enterprise operating in Telangana, is engaged in extraction of coal and holds mining leases granted under the Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957. In the course of mining operations, the company pays royalty to the State Government and also makes statutory contributions amounting to 30% of royalty to the District Mineral Foundation (DMF) and 2% of royalty to the National Mineral Exploration Trust (NMET), as mandated under Sections 9B and 9C of the MMDR Act.
Seeking clarity on GST implications, the applicant approached the Telangana State Authority for Advance Ruling (TSAAR), which ruled that royalty-related services fall under tariff entry 997337 and attract GST at 9% CGST and 9% SGST, and that the same rate applies to contributions made to DMF and NMET. Aggrieved by this ruling, the applicant filed an appeal before the Telangana State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling.
Main Issue: Whether statutory contributions made to DMF and NMET under the MMDR Act, 1957, can be treated as consideration for mining lease and subjected to GST.
AAAR's Ruling: The Appellate Authority held that only the question concerning the taxability of DMF and NMET contributions was maintainable, as the other issues raised in appeal were not originally placed before the lower authority.
The Authority upheld the approach of the lower authority, observing that the ruling relating to the applicability of GST under tariff entry 997337 to DMF and NMET contributions did not warrant interference. Therefore, the appeal was confined in scope, and no relief was granted on issues beyond those originally raised.
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2172My Recent Articles
- ITAT Pune Quashes Reassessment as Notice u/s 148A(d) Travelled Beyond Original AllegationsPremium
- ITAT Deletes PE Addition After Allowing Marketing Fees Paid to Indian SubsidiaryPremium
- ITAT Quashes Second Reassessment After Earlier Proceedings Had Already ConcludedPremium
- ITAT Rejects Maximum Marginal Rate on Public Charitable Trust IncomePremium
- GSTAT Orders Builder to Refund Rs 11.13 Lakh ITC Benefit to HomebuyersPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Tags
Recent Posts

All Posts








