Supreme Court Holds Tiger Global Liable to Pay Capital Gains Tax on Flipkart Exit

Apex Court denies India-Mauritius treaty benefit, ruling Flipkart-Walmart deal was structured to avoid Indian tax

Supreme Court: Tiger Global’s Flipkart Exit Taxable in India

Meetu Kumari | Jan 15, 2026 |

Supreme Court Holds Tiger Global Liable to Pay Capital Gains Tax on Flipkart Exit

Supreme Court Holds Tiger Global Liable to Pay Capital Gains Tax on Flipkart Exit

Tiger Global exited its investment in Flipkart in 2018 by selling its stake to Walmart for approximately USD 1.6 billion. The investment was held through a Mauritius-based company, and Tiger Global claimed exemption from capital gains tax under the India-Mauritius Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA).

The Income Tax Department challenged the claim, saying that the Mauritius structure was created mainly to avoid Indian capital gains tax on income arising from an India-centric business. The matter finally reached the Supreme Court.

Issues Before SC: Whether Tiger Global was entitled to claim a capital gains tax exemption under the India-Mauritius DTAA on the Flipkart stake sale, or whether the transaction was taxable in India as a tax-avoidance arrangement.

SC Ruled: The Supreme Court ruled in favour of the Income Tax Department and held that capital gains arising from Tiger Global’s USD 1.6 billion exit from Flipkart in 2018 are taxable in India. The Court denied treaty protection under the India-Mauritius DTAA, agreeing with the Revenue that the transaction structure was designed primarily to avoid Indian tax liability. The Court observed that the share sale arrangement between Tiger Global and Walmart constituted a tax-avoidant structure and, therefore, could not avail treaty benefits. It reiterated that while tax treaties aim to prevent double taxation, they cannot be used as instruments for tax avoidance.

The Court held that capital gains generated from an India-centric business cannot escape taxation merely through offshore structuring. Therefore, Tiger Global was held liable to pay capital gains tax in India on the Flipkart-Walmart transaction.

To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

StudyCafe Membership

Join StudyCafe Membership. For More details about Membership Click Join Membership Button
Join Membership

In case of any Doubt regarding Membership you can mail us at [email protected]

Join Studycafe's WhatsApp Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Government Job, Sarkari Naukri, Private Jobs, Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"




Author Bio
My Recent Articles
ITAT Upholds Rs. 37.85 Lakh Unexplained Expenditure Addition in Resort Search Case ITAT Deletes Rs. 4.30 Cr Addition on Change in Revenue Recognition Method; Holds Issue Is Mere Timing Difference High Court Quashes Section 264 Order, Reaffirms Binding Nature of ITAT Special Bench Rulings Purchases Supported by Invoices, Transport Documents and Bank Payments Cannot Be Held Bogus Merely Due to Supplier’s Non-Response: ITAT Criminal Case Principles Cannot Be Mechanically Applied to Civil Tax Litigation: High CourtView All Posts