Supreme Court Holds Tiger Global Liable to Pay Capital Gains Tax on Flipkart Exit:

Apex Court denies India-Mauritius treaty benefit, ruling Flipkart-Walmart deal was structured to avoid Indian tax
Supreme Court: Tiger Global’s Flipkart Exit Taxable in India

Supreme Court Holds Tiger Global Liable to Pay Capital Gains Tax on Flipkart Exit
Tiger Global exited its investment in Flipkart in 2018 by selling its stake to Walmart for approximately USD 1.6 billion. The investment was held through a Mauritius-based company, and Tiger Global claimed exemption from capital gains tax under the India-Mauritius Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA).
The Income Tax Department challenged the claim, saying that the Mauritius structure was created mainly to avoid Indian capital gains tax on income arising from an India-centric business. The matter finally reached the Supreme Court.
Issues Before SC: Whether Tiger Global was entitled to claim a capital gains tax exemption under the India-Mauritius DTAA on the Flipkart stake sale, or whether the transaction was taxable in India as a tax-avoidance arrangement.
SC Ruled: The Supreme Court ruled in favour of the Income Tax Department and held that capital gains arising from Tiger Global’s USD 1.6 billion exit from Flipkart in 2018 are taxable in India. The Court denied treaty protection under the India-Mauritius DTAA, agreeing with the Revenue that the transaction structure was designed primarily to avoid Indian tax liability. The Court observed that the share sale arrangement between Tiger Global and Walmart constituted a tax-avoidant structure and, therefore, could not avail treaty benefits. It reiterated that while tax treaties aim to prevent double taxation, they cannot be used as instruments for tax avoidance.
The Court held that capital gains generated from an India-centric business cannot escape taxation merely through offshore structuring. Therefore, Tiger Global was held liable to pay capital gains tax in India on the Flipkart-Walmart transaction.
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2174My Recent Articles
- ITAT Quashes Time-Barred Reassessment Notice Issued Beyond Six-Year LimitationPremium
- ITAT Deletes Rs 25.12 Crore Disallowance on Independent Section 36 Deduction ComputationPremium
- ITAT Pune Quashes Reassessment as Notice u/s 148A(d) Travelled Beyond Original AllegationsPremium
- ITAT Deletes PE Addition After Allowing Marketing Fees Paid to Indian SubsidiaryPremium
- ITAT Quashes Second Reassessment After Earlier Proceedings Had Already ConcludedPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








