Union Budget 2026-27: Penalty Proposed for Non-Reporting and Misreporting of Crypto Transactions:

The Union Budget 2026-27 proposes penalties for non-filing and incorrect reporting of crypto-asset transaction statements to strengthen compliance, effective from April 1, 2026.
Govt. Proposes New Penalties for Reporting Defaults

Union Budget 2026-27: Penalty Proposed for Non-Reporting and Misreporting of Crypto Transactions
With the release of the Union Budget 2026-27 on February 01, the government has proposed a key amendment concerning the non-furnishing of a statement or furnishing inaccurate information in a statement on the transaction of crypto-assets. As per the provisions of said section, the prescribed entities must submit a statement giving accurate details of transactions involving crypto-assets, in the manner and within the time prescribed by the law.
Section 509 of the Income Tax Act relates to the requirement of disclosing information related to the transaction of crypto-assets. To make sure taxpayers are complying with the provisions of the said section, the government has proposed introducing a penalty provision in case of non-furnishing of such a statement or for sharing inaccurate information in such a statement. This proposed penalty amounts to Rs. 200 per day for not filing a statement and Rs. 50,000 for filing incorrect information and failure to correct such inaccuracy.
In conclusion, the government is planning to make required changes in section 446 of the Act to include penalty provisions for not filing a statement and disclosing incorrect details related to the statement.
The said amendment is set to take effect from April 01, 2026.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2702My Recent Articles
- ITAT Condoned Delay After Noting Indeed Technical Glitch on E-filing Portal and Restores Section 12A and 80G ApplicationsPremium
- ITAT Rejects Section 69A Unexplained Money Addition Based on Alleged Over-Invoicing Entry Found in Third-Party SearchPremium
- ITAT Condoned 336-Day Delay in Section 68 Case After Taxpayer Cites Lack Of Online Communication AwarenessPremium
- United Breweries Secures Full Relief from Bombay High Court in Rs 21.92 Crore Service Tax Dispute
- Aries Agro Faces Rs 3.96 Crore GST Demand Over ITC Availment from Retrospectively Cancelled Vendors
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts








