ROC Slaps Penalty on Company for Incorrect Filing of Statutory E-Form

The ROC imposed a penalty of Rs 10,000 on Loghorn Industries and Rs 10,000 on Ravi Singhal for violating Rule 8(3) of the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014, read with Section 450 of the Companies Act.

Company Fined Due to Incorrect E-Form Filing

Nidhi | Jan 29, 2026 |

ROC Slaps Penalty on Company for Incorrect Filing of Statutory E-Form

ROC Slaps Penalty on Company for Incorrect Filing of Statutory E-Form

The Registrar of Companies (ROC), Kolkata, imposed a penalty on a company and its director for incorrectly filing a statutory e-form with the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA).

The company, Loghorn Industries Private Limited, filed e-AOC-4 (XBRL) for the financial year 2024-25. During an examination, it was found that this e-form had several errors. The e-form was filed with wrong particulars and invalid attachments. There was a data entry error in the “Purchase of Stock-in-Trade” field in the e-form. Further, the date of the Annual General Meeting (AGM) was incorrectly mentioned as September 30, 2025, instead of August 25, 2025.

This was a clear violation of Rule 8(3) of the Companies (The Registration Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014, which mandates that the authorised signatory and any professional certifying an e-form are responsible for the accuracy of the contents and enclosures attached to that form.

The company accepted its default and filed Form GNL-1, requesting the MCA to mark the earlier filing as defective. After examining the case, the ROC imposed a penalty of Rs 10,000 on Loghorn Industries and Rs 10,000 on Ravi Singhal for violating Rule 8(3) of the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014, read with Section 450 of the Companies Act, 2013.

The company and its director have been directed to correct this mistake by filing a correct E form on the MCA portal within 7 days. The company must pay the penalty within 90 days of receiving this order through the ‘e-Adjudication’ facility on the MCA portal. The order also clarifies that the penalty imposed on the director must be paid from his personal funds.

StudyCafe Membership

Join StudyCafe Membership. For More details about Membership Click Join Membership Button
Join Membership

In case of any Doubt regarding Membership you can mail us at [email protected]

Join Studycafe's WhatsApp Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Government Job, Sarkari Naukri, Private Jobs, Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"


Tags: MCA, ROC


Author Bio
My Recent Articles
Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Order Passed Without Proper Hearing Draft Income Tax Rules 2026: What are Major Income Tax Forms Renumbered as per new Act Draft IT Rules, 2026: CA Verification Required for Foreign Tax Credit Only Income Component of the Alleged Bogus Purchases Can be Taxed, Not the Entire Purchases: High Court Company Faces Penalty for Non-Filing Form MGT-14 for approving financial statementsView All Posts