WBAAR Clarifies 5% GST on Cured, Graded & Butted Tobacco Leaves:

AAR holds that cured, graded, bundled and butted tobacco leaves retain their character as “tobacco leaves” taxable at 5%
AAR: Cured and Graded Tobacco Leaves Taxable at 5% GST, Not 28%

WBAAR Clarifies 5% GST on Cured, Graded & Butted Tobacco Leaves
Om Jai Balajee Construction Private Limited, Kolkata, proposed to diversify into the trading of cured tobacco leaves purchased directly from farmers. The company intended to sell the leaves without any processing other than storage and stocking, and in some cases to undertake minor activities such as grading based on size, colour and texture, bundling, or butting (removal of rough edges) to prevent transportation damage. No stemming, stripping, crushing or manufacturing was proposed.
The applicant sought clarification on GST rate in three situations, sale of cured tobacco leaves as purchased, sale after grading, and sale after butting. The Revenue relied on Patel Products v. Union of India to argue that certain processes may amount to production attracting higher tax. The Authority examined GST entries and HSN classification under 2401.
Main Issue: Whether cured tobacco leaves subjected to grading, bundling or butting (without stemming/stripping) remain “tobacco leaves” taxable at 5% under Entry 162 of Schedule I, or become “unmanufactured tobacco (other than tobacco leaves)” taxable at 28%.
Authority's Decision: The Authority ruled in favour of the applicant, holding that tobacco leaves, even after curing, grading, bundling or butting, continue to qualify as “tobacco leaves” so long as they are not stemmed or stripped, and therefore attract GST at 5% (2.5% CGST + 2.5% SGST).
The Authority had drawn a distinction between tobacco not stemmed or stripped and tobacco partly or wholly stemmed or stripped; only upon stemming/stripping does the product lose its character as tobacco leaves. Therefore, all three scenarios proposed by the applicant were held taxable at 5%, provided the leaves retain their identity and are not stemmed or stripped.
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2161My Recent Articles
- ITAT Grants Section 80P Relief to Souharda Society, Remands Demonetisation DepositsPremium
- ITAT Deletes Additions After Ex-Army Personnel Explains Bank Credits with EvidencePremium
- ITAT Allows Section 80P Deduction on Interest Earned from Co-operative Bank DepositsPremium
- ITAT Quashes Consequential Assessment After Section 263 Revision Order FailsPremium
- ITAT Restricts Addition to Commission on Accommodation Cash Deposit TransactionsPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








