Supreme Court Dismisses 558-Day Delayed SLP, Imposes Rs. 50,000 Cost on Income Tax Department:

Supreme Court of India dismissed the CIT’s Special Leave Petition due to an unexplained 558-day delay and imposed a cost of Rs. 50,000 payable.
Supreme Court of India Rejects Time-Barred Appeal

Supreme Court Dismisses 558-Day Delayed SLP, Imposes Rs. 50,000 Cost on Income Tax Department
The Supreme Court of India dismissed the Special Leave Petition filed by the CIT against a company by refusing to condone a 558-day delay. Also, imposed a cost amounting to Rs. 50,000 on CIT, payable to the Armed Forces Battle Casualties Welfare Fund within four weeks.
The Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) had filed a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court of India against a company named ESS Distribution (Mauritius) SNC ETC Compagnie, challenging an order dated February 13, 2024, passed by the Delhi High Court in ITA No. 336 of 2023. The impugned order had dismissed the CIT's appeal.
The bench comprising Justice Rajesh Bindal and Justice Vijay Bishnoi heard the case on January 16, 2026. The Special Leave Petition in the Supreme Court of India was filed late by 558 days. The petitioner also furnished an application seeking condonation of delay. However, the court held that the application seeking condonation of delay did not provide sufficient reasons to accept such a long delay. Meaning, the court basically meant the reason mentioned in the application was not justified to condone such a long delay. Therefore, the court dismissed the petitioner's application of condonation of delay.
Accordingly, the Special Leave Petition was also dismissed. Additionally, the court imposed a penalty of Rs 50,000 on the petitioner for filing the appeal after such a significant delay and directed them to pay the imposed cost within the period of four weeks to the Armed Forces Battle Casualties Welfare Fund, maintained at Canara Bank, South Block, Defence Headquarters, New Delhi. The Registry was also instructed to forward a copy of the order to the specified email address for information. All pending applications in the matter were disposed of accordingly.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2487My Recent Articles
- ITAT Grants Fresh Opportunity to Explain Rs 2.39 Crore Demonetisation Cash Deposit Addition After Main Director’s DeathPremium
- ITAT Grants Taxpayer Fresh Opportunity to Contest Rs 44.16 Lakh Addition After Finding No Decision on MeritsPremium
- Trust’s Sections 12AB and 80G Registration Cannot Be Denied Before Charitable Project Is Completed, Holds ITATPremium
- ITAT Says Identity and Creditworthiness Irrelevant Where Loan Was Directly Paid to Haryana Mining DepartmentPremium
- Earlier Rejection Cannot Be Sole Ground to Reject Fresh Section 12AB and 80G Registration Applications, Says ITATPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








