SC held DRI officers have no power to issue show cause notices under Section 28(4) of the Customs Act, 1962

In Commissioner of Customs v. M/S Agarwal Metals and Alloys [Civil Appeal No. 3411/2020 dated August 31, 2021], the present appeal has been filed by Commissioner of Customs, Kandla (“the Appellant”) against the Order in Customs Appeal No. 11756 of 2019 dated February 13, 2020 by the Hon’ble CESTAT, Ahmedabad which held that demands confirmed by the Appellant, confiscation of goods and penalties imposed upon M/S Agarwal Metals and Alloys (“the Respondent”) was not sustainable.

The issue pertains to an investigation which was initiated by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (“DRI”) against various firms on the information that they were indulging in undervaluation of “Aluminium Scrap”. The Respondent filed an appeal in the Hon’ble CESTAT against the Order in Original [“OIO”] [OIO No. KND/Custom/000/Com/19/18- 19] dated March 26, 2019 [“OIO”] passed by the Commissioner of Customs, Kandla (“the Appellant”) which accepted the Respondent’s contention that import prices declared by it are comparable and noted that adoption of insurance value for alleging under-valuation in the OIO as improper. The Hon’ble CESTAT set aside the impugned order and allowed all the appeals with consequential reliefs to the Respondents.

Aggrieved by which, the Respondent has filed the current petition before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India has relied on the judgment in the case of M/S Canon India Private Limited v. Commissioner of Customs [Civil Appeal No. 1827 of 2018 dated March 09, 2021] to restate that the Additional Director General (“ADG”) of DRI is not the proper officer to issue Show Cause Notice (“SCN”) which has so been issued in the current matter under Section 28(4) read with Section 2(34) of the Customs Act, 1962.

Further, observed, because of the reason that DRI is not a proper officer, the entire proceeding stands invalid and the appeals stand dismissed.

Our Comment

In the case of M/S Canon India Private Limited v. Commissioner of Customs [Civil Appeal No. 1827 of 2018] dated March 09, 2021, the SCNs issued by the DRI were struck down for denying Basic Customs Duty (“BCD”) exemption on import of “Digital Still Image Video” cameras. By interpreting Section 28(4) the Customs Act, 1962, it was held that only a “proper officer” under the section can issue such a notice, thereby interpreting that the section provides the power only to the officer or his successor, who had originally been provided with the task of Assessment.

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and A2Z Taxcorp LLP. The contents of this article are solely for informational purpose and for the reader’s personal non-commercial use. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the author nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Further, no portion of our article or newsletter should be used for any purpose(s) unless authorized in writing and we reserve a legal right for any infringement on usage of our article or newsletter without prior permission.