ITAT Deletes Rs. 13.56 Lakh Penalty Under Section 271D; Cash Received on Flat Sale Held Bona Fide

Cash consideration from temple workers treated as genuine transaction; reasonable cause under Section 273B accepted

ITAT: No 271D Penalty if Cash on Property Sale Is Genuine and Reasonable Cause Proven

Meetu Kumari | Feb 17, 2026 |

ITAT Deletes Rs. 13.56 Lakh Penalty Under Section 271D; Cash Received on Flat Sale Held Bona Fide

ITAT Deletes Rs. 13.56 Lakh Penalty Under Section 271D; Cash Received on Flat Sale Held Bona Fide

The assessee, engaged in construction as M/s. Vidya Builders and also in private finance, filed his return for AY 2016-17 declaring income of Rs. 9,59,390, which was accepted under Section 143(3). During scrutiny, it was noticed that he had received Rs. 13,56,500 in cash from four buyers towards the sale of flats. As each receipt exceeded Rs. 20,000, penalty proceedings were initiated under Section 271D for alleged violation of Section 269SS.

The assessee explained that the buyers were temple workers without effective banking facilities and insisted on cash payments, and that refusal would have resulted in cancellation of transactions. The AO rejected the explanation and levied penalty equal to the cash received, which was confirmed by the CIT(A)/NFAC.

Issue Before Tribunal: Whether penalty under Section 271D was leviable for accepting Rs. 13,56,500 in cash, or whether the assessee had established “reasonable cause” under Section 273B.

Tribunal’s Ruling: The Tribunal noted that the receipt of cash and sale transactions were not in dispute. The genuineness of the transactions had been accepted during assessment proceedings, and buyers had filed confirmation letters. There was no finding that the transactions were sham or intended to introduce unaccounted money.

The Tribunal observed that penalty under Section 271D is not automatic. Section 273B provides relief where the assessee establishes bona fide circumstances. In the present case, the explanation that buyers lacked active banking access and insisted on cash was found plausible. The transactions were genuine and duly recorded.

The Tribunal directed deletion of the entire penalty of Rs. 13,56,500. The appeal was allowed.

To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

StudyCafe Membership

Join StudyCafe Membership. For More details about Membership Click Join Membership Button
Join Membership

In case of any Doubt regarding Membership you can mail us at [email protected]

Join Studycafe's WhatsApp Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Government Job, Sarkari Naukri, Private Jobs, Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"




Author Bio
My Recent Articles
ICAI Disciplinary Committee Reprimands CA for Acting as Statutory and Internal Auditor Simultaneously ITAT Deletes Rs. 13.56 Lakh Penalty Under Section 271D; Cash Received on Flat Sale Held Bona Fide ITAT Restricts Stock Addition to Rs. 19.46 Lakh; Survey Working Found Inflated ITAT Quashes Second Order Giving Effect; Holds Two Assessments Cannot Co-Exist ICAI Disciplinary Committee Reprimands CA for Compromised Independence in Group CompaniesView All Posts