AAR Allows ITC on Specialized Foundation and Structural Supports for Pharmaceutical Machinery:

Foundations for lyophilized injectable plant and machinery qualify for tax credits, not "civil structures" or "land," rules Authority
AAR allows CPL Pharmaceuticals to claim ITC on specialized foundations for plant and machinery

AAR Allows ITC on Specialized Foundation and Structural Supports for Pharmaceutical Machinery
The applicant, M/s CPL Pharmaceuticals Private Limited, is a pharmaceutical company setting up a manufacturing facility for "lyophilized injectables." This process requires highly sophisticated and heavy plant and machinery, which necessitate foundations and structural supports to ensure stability, precision, and vibration control.
The applicant sought an advance ruling to determine whether they are eligible to claim Input Tax Credit (ITC) on the input services and goods used for the construction of these foundations. The core of the dispute revolved around Section 17(5)(c) and (d) of the CGST Act, which generally blocks ITC for "immovable property" and "civil structures" but provides an exception for "plant and machinery."
Main Issue: Whether the specialized foundation and structural support constructed for the installation of pharmaceutical plant and machinery qualify as "plant and machinery" under the Explanation to Section 17 of the CGST Act, thereby making the applicant eligible for ITC.
AAR's Decision: The Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) ruled in favor of the applicant. The Authority observed that the "Explanation" to Section 17 clearly states that the term "plant and machinery" includes foundations and structural supports that are used to fasten the machinery to the earth.
The AAR noted that the structures in question were not general civil constructions like buildings or warehouses but were specifically designed and engineered to support the weight and operational requirements of the lyophilization equipment. As such foundations are essential for the functioning of the plant and machinery and are specifically excluded from the "immovable property" restriction by the law, the applicant is eligible to avail ITC on the GST paid for their construction.
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2175My Recent Articles
- ITAT Allows Genuine Tax Planning, Deletes Rs.258 Crore Section 68 AdditionPremium
- ITAT Quashes Time-Barred Reassessment Notice Issued Beyond Six-Year LimitationPremium
- ITAT Deletes Rs 25.12 Crore Disallowance on Independent Section 36 Deduction ComputationPremium
- ITAT Pune Quashes Reassessment as Notice u/s 148A(d) Travelled Beyond Original AllegationsPremium
- ITAT Deletes PE Addition After Allowing Marketing Fees Paid to Indian SubsidiaryPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Tags
Recent Posts

All Posts








