AAR Classifies Paddle Wheel Aerators Used in Aquaculture Under 18% GST Bracket:

Paddle Wheel Aerators for fish and shrimp farming held as general machinery, AAR rejected the 12% agricultural machinery claim
18% GST on Paddle Wheel Aerators: Gujarat AAR Classification

AAR Classifies Paddle Wheel Aerators Used in Aquaculture Under 18% GST Bracket
The applicant, Sagar Aqua Culture Private Limited, is a manufacturer and seller of "Paddle Wheel Aerators" and their parts. These machines are used exclusively in aquaculture like shrimp and fish farming, to increase dissolved oxygen levels in water. The applicant sought an advance ruling to determine the correct GST classification and rate for these aerators.
They argued that the product should be classified under HSN 8436 as "agricultural, horticultural, forestry, poultry-keeping, or bee-keeping machinery," which attracts a lower GST rate of 12%. Their contention was based on the premise that aquaculture is akin to agriculture.
Main Issue: Whether "Paddle Wheel Aerators" used in aquaculture should be classified under HSN 8436 & taxable at 12% as agricultural machinery taxable at 18% as mechanical appliances with individual functions not specified elsewhere.
AAR's Ruling: The Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) ruled against the applicant’s proposed classification under HSN 8436. The Authority observed that the HSN 8436 specifically covers machinery for agriculture, horticulture, forestry, poultry-keeping, or bee-keeping, and aquaculture is not explicitly mentioned in this heading or the relevant Explanatory Notes.
The AAR noted that while aquaculture is related to the primary sector, the Customs Tariff Act and GST notifications maintain a distinction between "agriculture" and "aquaculture" for the purpose of HSN classification. Thus, the Authority held that the "Paddle Wheel Aerators" are more appropriately classified under HSN 8479, which acts as a residuary heading for machines with individual functions. Therefore, the product is liable to GST at the rate of 18% (9% CGST and 9% SGST).
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2231My Recent Articles
- ITAT Restricts Bogus Purchase Addition to 1.15% Profit Element Despite Seller DenialsPremium
- ITAT Upholds Reassessment, Rejects Challenge Over Absence of Section 143(2) NoticePremium
- High Court Quashes Section 148 Notice Based on Wrong Assessee's Investigation ReportPremium
- ITAT Allows Set-Off of Brought Forward Business Loss Against Section 50 Capital GainsPremium
- High Court Quashes Reassessment Based on Mere Change of Opinion After ScrutinyPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Tags
Recent Posts

All Posts








