AAR Denies Ruling on Erroneous GST ITC Adjustment and Refund:

Tamil Nadu Authority for Advance Ruling refuses ruling on erroneous GST ITC adjustment and refund claim by dealer.
Advance Ruling Rejected on Mistaken GST ITC Claims in Tamil Nadu

AAR Denies Ruling on Erroneous GST ITC Adjustment and Refund
The present appeal has been filed by a company named M/s. Auto Color Paints (appellant) before the Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Chennai, under Sub-Section (1) of Section 100 of the CGST Act 2017/TNGST Act 2017. The company has a registered address at No. 182 E4/15, S.P.Р Building, S.N. High Road, Tirunelveli - 627 001.
The appellant is a dealer of PPG Asian Paints and is registered under GST, possessing GSTIN 33ABBFA7732P1Z8. The appellant claimed that they were a dealer for M/s. PPG Asian Paints and received purchase bills from them. However, they mistakenly reported these purchase bills as sales bills in their GSTR-1 returns and also paid GST on them during the period from 2017-18 to 2022-23. Because of this mistake, the Input Tax Credit (ITC) they had claimed from these purchase bills was incorrectly returned to them through the GSTR-1 returns they filed.
The applicant further mentioned that there are no actual invoices or goods transfers for the Auto Color Paints. They requested that their outstanding balance be corrected to include the full ITC credit of Rs. 18,53,429.21 (SGST Rs. 9,26,714.60 and CGST Rs. 9,26,714.60). The applicant also stated that they asked M/s. PPG Asian Paints to adjust the ITC in their books, but M/s. PPG Asian Paints refused to make the change.
Questions Asked by Appellant:
The appellant, M/s. Auto Color Paints, has asked the following questions, seeking the Tamil Nadu Advance Ruling No. 23/ARA/2025, dated July 14, 2025:
"Question 1. ITC credit will be adjusted in the books of accounts - outstanding payable amount?
Question 2. ITC erroneously transfer will be eligible for refund?"
What Did the Ruling Say?
In accordance with the Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamil Nadu No. 207, 2nd Floor, Papjm Building, No. 1, Greams Road, Chennai 600 006, the following answers have been given to the above questions:
The authority has not admitted the advance ruling application filed by the appellant. For this, the Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Chennai, gave the reason that the questions as asked by the appellant do not fall under any of the clauses from (a) to (g) of Section 97(2) of the CGST/TNGST Acts, 2017.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2389My Recent Articles
- ITAT Remands Section 69 Unexplained Cash Credit Addition After Bank Statement Was Not ExaminedPremium
- ITAT Remands Transfer Pricing Dispute: DRP to Reassess Comparables and Working Capital AdjustmentPremium
- CBDT Notifies TDS Exemption on Aircraft Lease Payments to IFSC Units Under 20-Year Tax Deduction Scheme Premium
- CBDT Grants TDS Exemption On Ship Leasing Payments To IFSC Units Under 20-Year Tax Deduction SchemePremium
- ITAT Remands Case to CIT(A) After Admitting Crucial Sale Deed as Additional Evidence
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Tags
Recent Posts

All Posts









