GST Classification and ITC Eligibility on Plastic Toys: Gujarat AAAR Upholds Earlier Ruling, Rejects Appeal:

Gujarat AAAR rejected an appeal challenging GST classification and ITC eligibility, citing non-disclosure of key facts under Section 104 of the CGST Act.
GST Appeal Dismissed Over Misclassification and Ineligible ITC Claims

GST Classification and ITC Eligibility on Plastic Toys: Gujarat AAAR Upholds Earlier Ruling, Rejects Appeal
The present advance ruling (No. GUJ/GAAAR/APPEAL/2025/13) dated July 31, 2025, has been filed by a company named M/s. I-Tech Plast India Private Limited (Applicant) under Section 100 of the CGST Act, 2017 and the GGST Act, 2017, against the Advance Ruling No. GUJ/GAAR/R/2024/O4 dated 03.02.2024. The company has a registered address at Survey No. 108-109, Bhavnagar-Rajkot Highway, Shampara, Bhavnagar.
Questions Asked by Appellant:
The appellant, M/s. I-Tech Plast India Private Limited has asked the following questions, seeking the Gujarat Advance Ruling No. GUJ/GAAAR/APPEAL/2025/13, dated July 31, 2025:
"Question 1: What is the appropriate classification & rate of GST applicable on the supply of plastic toys under CGST & SGST?
Question 2: Can the applicant claim ITC in relation to CGST-IGST separately in debit notes issued by the supplier in the current financial year, i.e., 2020-21, towards the transactions for the period 2018-19?"
What Did Ruling Say?
In accordance with the Gujarat Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling Goods and Services Tax D/5, Rajya Kar Bhavan, Ashram Road, Ahmedabad – 380009, the following answers have been given to the above questions:
Answer 1: The product ‘Plastic Toys’ is made and sold by M/s. I-tech Plast India Pvt. Ltd., located at Survey No. 108-109, Bhavnagar-Rajkot Highway, Shampara, Bhavnagar, is classified under the relevant category as per the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, and the GST rate is applied according to Notification No. 01/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017, along with any updates. The details are given in the table below.
Answer 2: No, the applicant cannot claim Input Tax Credit (ITC) in relation to CGST-IGST separately in debit notes issued by the supplier in the current financial year, i.e., 2020-21, towards the transactions for the period 2018-19, for the reasons as discussed above.
Citing a previous decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Gujarat Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling ruled that none of the cases mentioned by the applicant deal with the interpretation of Section 104 of the CGST Act, 2017. However, in this case, we have already found that important facts were not disclosed to the Advance Ruling Authority. Because of this, the Advance Ruling given earlier (GAAR Order No. GUJIGAAR/R/10/2021 dated 20.01.2021) is considered invalid under Section 104 of the CGST Act, 2017.
On the basis of the above filings, the Gujarat Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling rejected the appeal filed by M/s. I-Tech Plast India Private Limited (Applicant) against the Advance Ruling No. GUJIGAAR/R/2024/04 dated 03.02.2024, issued by the Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling.
| Sr. No. | Name of the Product | Customs Tariff Code (as per First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975) | GST Rate |
| 1 | Plastic toys | 95030030 | 12% (6% SGST + 6% CGST) |
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2484My Recent Articles
- ITAT Says Identity and Creditworthiness Irrelevant Where Loan Was Directly Paid to Haryana Mining DepartmentPremium
- Earlier Rejection Cannot Be Sole Ground to Reject Fresh Section 12AB and 80G Registration Applications, Says ITATPremium
- Cash Deposited During Demonetisation Cannot Be Taxed Under Section 69A if Linked to Business, Holds ITAT Premium
- ITAT Condones 1,731-Day Delay, Remands Cancer Trust's Section 12A Registration Application for Fresh ConsiderationPremium
- ITAT Lowers Estimated Profit Rate from 8% to 4% After Considering State Shutdown and Medicine Trade MarginsPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Tags
No tags yet.
Recent Posts

All Posts

Tags
No tags yet.







