AAR: Health Services via Third-Party Contractors to Government Not Exempt from GST:

AAR: Health Services via Third-Party Contractors to Government Not Exempt from GST

Advance Ruling Clarifies that Immediate Recipient of Service Determines Taxability, Not the Ultimate Beneficiary

AAR: No GST Exemption for Sub-contractors of Govt Projects

authorMeetu KumaridateApr 6, 2026
Last update on Apr 6, 2026
AAR: Health Services via Third-Party Contractors to Government Not Exempt from GST The applicant, M/s Indovation Healthcare LLP, entered into a sub-contracting agreement with M/s Braithwaite & Co. Limited (the main contractor). The main contractor had an agreement with the Urban Development Directorate (UDD), Government of Uttarakhand, to provide healthcare services, including the setting up and operationalizing of health centers. The applicant was responsible for providing infrastructure, manpower, and operational support.
SC Declines Interference, Allows GST Appeal Without Limitation Objection
The applicant sought an advance ruling on whether their services were exempt under Entry No. 3 or 3A of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate), which provides exemptions for "pure services" or "composite supply" provided to Central/State Governments or Local Authorities in relation to functions entrusted to a Panchayat or Municipality. Main Issue: Whether the healthcare services provided by a sub-contractor (the applicant) to a main contractor (a PSU), which are ultimately utilized by a Government Department (UDD), qualify for GST exemption as services provided "to" the Government. AAR's Ruling: The Authority for Advance Rulings (AAR), Uttarakhand, ruled that the applicant’s services are taxable and do not qualify for exemption. The Authority observed that taxability is determined by the "immediate recipient" of the service.
GSTAT Chennai Bench Functional: Appeals Directed To Be Filed via Bengaluru Bench
In this case, there are two distinct supplies: (i) the applicant to the main contractor, and (ii) the main contractor to the UDD. Since the applicant’s immediate recipient is M/s Braithwaite & Co. Limited (a commercial entity/PSU) and not the Government of Uttarakhand directly, the condition of providing services "to" the Government as per the exemption notification is not met. The AAR highlighted that the "ultimate beneficiary" (the Government/Public) is irrelevant for determining the GST liability of the sub-contractor. To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2157
Up Next

Loading suggestions…