Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Orders After Department Contradicts Its Own ‘No Dues’ Finding:

The High Court quashed subsequent GST orders after noting that the department had already passed an earlier order confirming that no tax was payable by the company.
High Court Nullifies GST Orders After ‘No Demand’ Finding

Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Orders After Department Contradicts Its Own ‘No Dues’ Finding
The present writ petition has been filed by M/s Polestar Software Private Limited in the Allahabad High Court challenging GST orders dated December 31, 2023 and September 30, 2024, passed by the GST authorities.
The GST authority argued that the petition was time-barred by one and a half years, meaning it was filed beyond the statutory time limit allowed under the law. Therefore, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed on the ground of unexplained delay (laches). On the other hand, the petitioner claimed that the proceedings were initiated without jurisdiction. Initially, a show cause notice (DRC-01A) dated October 14, 2022, was issued for the financial year 2017-18; subsequently, another notice dated September 30, 2023, was issued for the same FY, even referring to the earlier notice.
The petitioner flagged that in the second notice dated September 30, 2023, the date for the personal hearing, i.e., October 10, 2023, was fixed prior to the last date for filing the reply, i.e., October 30, 2023. The petitioner quickly filed a reply to the notice, and the GST authority too accepted the explanation vide an order dated December 30, 2023, and clearly recorded that no tax was payable and no demand was outstanding.
Even after considering the reply, the authorities issued an order dated December 31, 2023, and thereafter rejected the petitioner's appeal on September 30, 2024, without properly considering the earlier order that had already cleared the petitioner of any liability.
The Court observed that although the explanation for delay was not very strong, the key fact remained that once the order dated December 30, 2023 had accepted the petitioner’s reply and found no dues, it made the entire subsequent orders invalid. Accordingly, the court quashed the impugned GST orders dated December 31, 2023 and September 30, 2024, passed by the GST authorities, with no order as to costs.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2587My Recent Articles
- Rs 1.48 Crore Interest on Delayed Property Payments Qualifies as Cost of Acquisition: ITAT DelhiPremium
- ROC Penalises Company and Director Rs 20,000 for Wrong AGM Date in Form AOC-4CFSPremium
- ROC Penalises Company's Eight Directors Over Non-Appointment of Two Independent Directors for FY 2015-16 to 2018-19Premium
- An Inadvertent Typographical Error in Tax Audit Report Should Not Lead to An Unmerited Disallowance, Rules ITATPremium
- 21 CBI Officials Honoured With President’s Medals for Distinguished and Meritorious Service on 80th Independence Day
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts







