AO should Record reason before passing order of attachment of Assets under GST : HC

AO should Record reason before passing order of attachment of Assets under GST : HC M/S PATRAN STEEL ROLLING MILL Versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIO

AO should Record reason before passing order of attachment of Assets under GST : HC
M/S PATRAN STEEL ROLLING MILL Versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX, UNIT 2
Facts : The Assessee company is engaged in manufacturing & supplying TMT bars and paid GST on the same. The Revenue visited the Assessee's factory & compared stock of raw material & finished goods with recorded quantity of the same. Investigation at the end of the transporters revealed that the Assessee supplied & received goods without payment of tax. The Assessee was also compelled to give postdated cheques towards payment. Later the Revenue passed an order of attachment against the stock found to be in excess. Several bank accounts operated by the Assessee & its executives were also attached - The Assessee claimed that the attachment of the bank accounts had crippled the day-to-day activities of the Assessee & was impeding upon its ability to pay taxes .
The Honble High Court held as under :
As per mandate of Section 83(1) of the GGST Act, the Commr. must record written reasons before attaching any property or bank accounts or taking any such drastic action. Besides, the Commr. must record satisfaction that such action was justified so as to protect the Revenue's interests. In the present case, the Commr. recorded no such satisfaction. Hence no opinion could be formed to validate the provisional attachment of property. Hence the attachment order is unsustainable. Besides, the sum already deposited by the Assessee need not be construed as admission of dues on its part. Before exercising powers u/s 83 of the GGST Act, the Revenue must balance the interest of the Revenue with those of the assessee, so as to ensure that while the Revenue's interests are safeguarded, the functioning of the Assessee does not get crippled. Drastic action u/s 83 of the Act is justified if the assessee is a fly-by-night operator or habitual offender, which is not the case here. Powers under this provision must be exercised after due application of mind. Hence the attachment of the bank accounts is directed to be lifted.
About Author

CA Deepak Gupta
Co Founder
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
3423My Recent Articles
- UltraTech Cement slapped with Rs. 808.78 Cr Income Tax Demand
- GST: High Court upheld constitutional validity of Section 16(2)(c), asks government to address ITC issues of genuine purchasers
- Old vs New Tax Regime for Tax Year 2026-27
- High court criticizes Income Tax Department for not releasing ITR Utilities despite 11 years of directions
- Fino Payments Bank CEO Rishi Gupta Gets Bail in GST Case, Bank Clarifies No Direct Link
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Tags
No tags yet.
Recent Posts

All Posts

Tags
No tags yet.








