Canara Bank Fined Rs 41.80 Lakh by RBI Over KYC Compliance Violations:

The RBI has imposed a Rs 41.80 lakh penalty on Canara Bank for non-compliance with KYC norms and improper classification of certain customer accounts as inoperative.
Canara Bank Discloses RBI Penalty to Stock Exchange

Canara Bank Fined Rs 41.80 Lakh by RBI Over KYC Compliance Violations
On June 05, 2026, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) had imposed a monetary penalty amounting to Rs 41.80 lakh on Canara Bank over non-adherence with certain directions issued by it concerning ‘Know Your Customer (KYC)’ and ‘Unclaimed Deposits/Inoperative Accounts in Banks'.
The RBI had levied the aforesaid penalty in exercise of its powers granted under provisions of section 47A(1)(c) read with sections 46(4)(i) and 51(1) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. This action was taken after a statutory inspection for Supervisory Evaluation (ISE 2025) of the Canara Bank, conducted by the RBI, in accordance with the bank's financial position as of March 31, 2025.
Based on the findings of the inspection conducted, the RBI issued a show cause notice (SCN) to the Canara Bank proposing a penalty amounting to Rs 41.80 lakh, asking the bank to explain why the proposed action should not be taken against it.
In response to the notice, the Canara Bank filed a detailed reply and also furnished relevant submissions during the scheduled personal hearing. However, the RBI did not find the reply and submissions appropriate and hence concluded to confirm the Rs 41.80 lakh penalty. The following charges on Canra Bank have been confirmed.
- "i) The bank did not upload KYC records of certain customers onto the Central KYC Records Registry (CKYCR) within the prescribed timeline.
- ii) The bank classified certain accounts as inoperative, despite the last customer-induced transaction being less than one year old in such accounts."
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2458My Recent Articles
- A Taxpayer Cannot Be Forced to Pay GST Twice Merely Because Tax Paid Under Wrong Head, Rules High CourtPremium
- ITAT Restores Appeal After Condoning 1,929-Day Delay Caused by Director’s Jail Term and IllnessPremium
- Partial Tax Refund Must Be Adjusted Against Interest First, ITAT Upholds Section 244A Refund Interest ComputationPremium
- Farmer Receives Rs 72.76 Lakh GST Recovery Notice for Alleged Shell Company in Tamil Nadu
- ITAT Deletes Rs 2.42 Lakh Disallowance, Allows Depreciation on Capitalised Forex Loss Under Section 43APremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








