Canara Bank Fined Rs 41.80 Lakh by RBI Over KYC Compliance Violations:

The RBI has imposed a Rs 41.80 lakh penalty on Canara Bank for non-compliance with KYC norms and improper classification of certain customer accounts as inoperative.
Canara Bank Discloses RBI Penalty to Stock Exchange

Canara Bank Fined Rs 41.80 Lakh by RBI Over KYC Compliance Violations
On June 05, 2026, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) had imposed a monetary penalty amounting to Rs 41.80 lakh on Canara Bank over non-adherence with certain directions issued by it concerning ‘Know Your Customer (KYC)’ and ‘Unclaimed Deposits/Inoperative Accounts in Banks'.
The RBI had levied the aforesaid penalty in exercise of its powers granted under provisions of section 47A(1)(c) read with sections 46(4)(i) and 51(1) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. This action was taken after a statutory inspection for Supervisory Evaluation (ISE 2025) of the Canara Bank, conducted by the RBI, in accordance with the bank's financial position as of March 31, 2025.
Based on the findings of the inspection conducted, the RBI issued a show cause notice (SCN) to the Canara Bank proposing a penalty amounting to Rs 41.80 lakh, asking the bank to explain why the proposed action should not be taken against it.
In response to the notice, the Canara Bank filed a detailed reply and also furnished relevant submissions during the scheduled personal hearing. However, the RBI did not find the reply and submissions appropriate and hence concluded to confirm the Rs 41.80 lakh penalty. The following charges on Canra Bank have been confirmed.
- "i) The bank did not upload KYC records of certain customers onto the Central KYC Records Registry (CKYCR) within the prescribed timeline.
- ii) The bank classified certain accounts as inoperative, despite the last customer-induced transaction being less than one year old in such accounts."
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2447My Recent Articles
- ITAT Upholds Section 148 Reopening But Restricts Rs 30 Lakh Accommodation Entry Addition To 5%, Cites Double TaxationPremium
- Claiming Full TDS Credit Without Reporting Entire Income Is Underreporting, Not Misreporting: ITAT Premium
- ITAT Quashes Rs 7.03 Crore Reassessment, Holds AO Cannot Make Additions Beyond Recorded Reasons for ReopeningPremium
- ITAT Condones 650-Day Delay in Matter of Unexplained Cash Deposits During Specified Bank Notes PeriodPremium
- ITAT Quashed Reassessment Proceedings as Section 148 Notices Issued Beyond Statutory Time LimitPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








