News

The government is also planning to bring changes to ease the tender process for the domestic audit firms in big government audits to enhance their participation.

Govt May Mandate Inclusion of Indian Audit Firms in Big Government Tenders

A comprehensive overview of the technical challenges and user issues reported on the MCA-21 V3 portal, as highlighted by ICSI in its formal communication to MCA.

Extend due dates for filing ROC Annual Forms: ICSI's Plea for Relief amid MCA-21 V3 Portal Glitches

Judgement

The Himachal Pradesh High Court quashes the order cancelling GST registration, subject to clearing all tax dues leviable by November 15, 2025.

Relief Granted with Condition to Clear Dues by Nov 15, HC Restores Cancelled GST Registration

GSTAT dismisses DGAP's report, concluding that the company did not profiteer by not passing on ITC benefits, and closes the anti-profiteering proceedings.

GSTAT Sets Aside Rs.1.49 Crore Profiteering Order, Grants Full Relief to Assessee

The ITAT held that the reason was levying a penalty, saying that the assessee failed to benchmark the international as well as specified domestic transactions, is not permissible under the provisions of section 271G of the Act.

Section 271G Penalty is Levied for Non-Submission of Information and Not for Failure to Benchmark: ITAT Ahmedabad

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Ahmedabad, grants full relief to the assessee, deleting Rs. 11.70 lakh added as unexplained loan under Section 68.

Explore Our Blogs

Govt May Mandate Inclusion of Indian Audit Firms in Big Government Tenders

Extend due dates for filing ROC Annual Forms: ICSI's Plea for Relief amid MCA-21 V3 Portal Glitches

Relief Granted with Condition to Clear Dues by Nov 15, HC Restores Cancelled GST Registration

GSTAT Sets Aside Rs.1.49 Crore Profiteering Order, Grants Full Relief to Assessee

Section 271G Penalty is Levied for Non-Submission of Information and Not for Failure to Benchmark: ITAT Ahmedabad

Relief Granted: ITAT Deletes Entire Rs. 11.70 Lakh Addition in Loan Dispute Under Section 68