Judgement

GST registration was cancelled; the High Court, following precedent, allowed the petitioner to seek revocation under Section 30 and disposed of the case accordingly.

GST Cancellation Set Aside; Revocation Application Allowed

The tax authority tried to impose a retroactive penalty on a hospital for using funds within a legally allowed six-year period that was later shortened.

Protecting Charitable Funds from Retrospective Tax Rules: ITAT

Rs 7.96 Cr addition was cut to Rs 24.18 L based on fresh evidence, but it was accepted without the AO’s review. Court held this violated Rule 46A and due process.

Big Tax Dispute: Rs 7.96 Cr Addition Slashed After New Evidence, But Rule 46A Ignored by AO

ITAT Mumbai held that reassessment under Sections 147/148 was invalid as it was based on issues already decided in favour of the assessee. The ₹12.83 crore capital gains addition was deleted since no conversion or sale took place.

ITAT Mumbai Rejects Reopening and  Deletes ₹12.83 Cr Capital Gains Addition

ITAT Mumbai Rejects Reopening and Deletes Rs 12.83 Cr Capital Gains Addition

The Karnataka HC held that serious GST allegations must be backed by proper verification and remanded the case for fresh review after the taxpayer submitted supporting evidence.

High Court Stresses Need for Proper Verification; Remands Case of GST Non-genuine Purchases

ITAT Quashes Assumption-Based Additions; Holds Tax Additions Are Unjustified Without Solid Evidence