News

The bombay high court ruled that the show cause notice and the GST order against the company's concerned officers were issued without proper jurisdiction.

Shemaroo Entertainment Gets Relief as Bombay HC Sets Aside Rs 133.61 Crore Penalty

Judgement

The Supreme Court of India has ruled that Rooh Afza qualifies for the category of fruit drink under the UP VAT Act, making it liable to 4% VAT instead of 12.5%.

Supreme Court Holds Rooh Afza is Fruit Drink, Not Unclassified Item; Liable to Attract 4% VAT

Issuing a second notice under Section 148 without fulfilling mandatory conditions of Section 148A is bad in law, rules ITAT

ITAT Quashes Reassessment Proceedings Due to Procedural Lapses and Absence of New Tangible Material

The HC dismissed the Customs Department’s writ petition and upheld the order permitting redemption of 300 grams of seized gold upon payment of fine, penalty, and duty.

Delhi High Court Upholds Relief to Woman in IGI Gold Seizure Case; Customs Plea Dismissed

ITAT noted that the assessee company was assembling different components into a combined engine cooling system at its Uttarakhand Unit, and without this process, the final product could not exist.

Assembling Components to Form New Module Qualifies as Manufacturing Activity: ITAT

Assembling Components into a New Commercial Product Would Qualify as Manufacturing Activity: ITAT

Supreme Court held that attachment and confiscation proceedings under the Benami Act fall outside IBC jurisdiction

Explore Our Blogs

Shemaroo Entertainment Gets Relief as Bombay HC Sets Aside Rs 133.61 Crore Penalty

Supreme Court Holds Rooh Afza is Fruit Drink, Not Unclassified Item; Liable to Attract 4% VAT

ITAT Quashes Reassessment Proceedings Due to Procedural Lapses and Absence of New Tangible Material

Delhi High Court Upholds Relief to Woman in IGI Gold Seizure Case; Customs Plea Dismissed

Assembling Components into a New Commercial Product Would Qualify as Manufacturing Activity: ITAT

NCLT Cannot Review Benami Attachment Orders: Supreme Court Dismisses Liquidators’ Appeals with Costs