Judgement

ROC penalised the company and its three directors for failing to appoint a resident director as required under Section 149(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 for over 2,200 days.

No Resident Director for 2,297 Days: ROC Slaps Penalty on Company and Its Directors for Section 149(3) Violation

Orders

The ROC imposed penalties on the company and its officers for failing to file the FY22 annual return under Section 92 of the Companies Act, 2013.

ROC Patna Imposes Penalty for Non-Filing of FY22 Annual Return

When a company's paid-up share goes beyond the limit of Rs 100 crore or the turnover exceeds Rs 300 crore, such a company is mandatorily required to appoint at least one woman director.

Delay in Appointing Woman Director Leads to Company and Directors Facing ROC Penalty

ROC Bangalore levies penalties on the company and its officers in default for violating section 173(1) of the Companies Act.

ROC Imposes Penalty for Delay in Holding Board Meeting Under Companies Act

For violating Section 155 of the Companies Act, the ROC levied a penalty of Rs 50,000 each on its two directors.

ROC Imposes Penalty on Directors for Holding Two DINs

Articles

ICAI has released a new handbook which covers all legal compliances and exemptions for private limited companies.

Explore Our Blogs

No Resident Director for 2,297 Days: ROC Slaps Penalty on Company and Its Directors for Section 149(3) Violation

ROC Patna Imposes Penalty for Non-Filing of FY22 Annual Return

Delay in Appointing Woman Director Leads to Company and Directors Facing ROC Penalty

ROC Imposes Penalty for Delay in Holding Board Meeting Under Companies Act

ROC Imposes Penalty on Directors for Holding Two DINs

ICAI Handbook on Key Compliances and Exemptions under Companies Act, 2013