Judgement

High Court holds that reassessment notices issued by Jurisdictional Assessing Officers are without jurisdiction

HC Quashes Notices Issued by Jurisdictional Officers: Re-Assessment Must Be 100% Faceless

Non-filing of ITR by suppliers does not render purchases bogus, when purchases have been substantiated via invoices, GRNs, e-way bills, transport records, bank payments, GST data

Non-filing of ITR by suppliers does not render purchases bogus: ITAT

The Tribunal cited the case of Arvind Kumar Agarwal vs. ITO (supra), which also clarified that the condition requiring the timely submission of a return for claiming a deduction under section 10AA was applicable from 1.04.2024.

ITAT: Section 10AA Deduction Can’t Be Denied for AY 2023-24 for Belated Return or Form 56F Filed Within Extended Time

News

India’s tax landscape is shifting as young professionals increasingly earn from salaries, driving a sharp rise in complex, multi-income tax filings.

Indian's Shift from Salary Earners to Multi-Income Taxpayers as number of ITR-3 filers increase

The ITAT held that since the loss was withdrawn and no benefit was availed by the assessee, the required condition for levying a penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was not satisfied.

ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty for Withdrawn claim of carry forward of loss

ITAT Mumbai dismissed the taxpayer’s appeal for repeated non-appearance, upholding a Rs. 28.59 lakh addition for unexplained cash deposits.

Explore Our Blogs

Stay updated with the latest insights, tips, and industry trends from our experts

HC Quashes Notices Issued by Jurisdictional Officers: Re-Assessment Must Be 100% Faceless

Non-filing of ITR by suppliers does not render purchases bogus: ITAT

ITAT: Section 10AA Deduction Can’t Be Denied for AY 2023-24 for Belated Return or Form 56F Filed Within Extended Time

Indian's Shift from Salary Earners to Multi-Income Taxpayers as number of ITR-3 filers increase

ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty for Withdrawn claim of carry forward of loss

ITAT Upholds 28.59 Lakh Addition on Taxpayer for Unexplained Cash Deposits; Appeal Dismissed