Non-filing of ITR by suppliers does not render purchases bogus: ITAT

Non-filing of ITR by suppliers does not render purchases bogus, when purchases have been substantiated via invoices, GRNs, e-way bills, transport records, bank payments, GST data

ITAT Mumbai Rejects Rs. 25.55 Cr Bogus Purchase Addition in Everest Food Case

Meetu Kumari | Jan 7, 2026 |

Non-filing of ITR by suppliers does not render purchases bogus: ITAT

Non-filing of ITR by suppliers does not render purchases bogus: ITAT

M/s Everest Food Products Pvt. Ltd., engaged in manufacture and sale of spices under the “Everest” brand, filed its return for AY 2021-22 declaring income of Rs. 517.71 crore. The case was selected for scrutiny on the grounds of substantial purchases from certain suppliers allegedly identified as non-filers or low-turnover entities.

The Assessing Officer treated purchases of Rs. 55.55 crore from four suppliers as non-genuine solely because some suppliers had not filed income-tax returns or audited their accounts, and without rejecting the books, applied a gross profit rate of 46%, making an addition of Rs. 25.55 crore.

The CIT(A) deleted the addition after noting that the assessee had furnished complete documentary evidence supporting the purchases.

Main Issue: Whether purchases can be treated as non-genuine merely because suppliers allegedly failed to file income-tax returns or audit accounts, despite comprehensive documentary evidence and audited books.

ITAT Held: The ITAT dismissed the Revenue’s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)’s order. It held that non-filing of returns by suppliers, by itself, does not render purchases bogus. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had substantiated the purchases through invoices, GRNs, e-way bills, transport records, bank payments, GST data, and income-tax portal records.

The Assessing Officer neither disproved the evidence nor conducted any independent enquiry to establish that the suppliers were accommodation entry providers, nor were corresponding sales disturbed. Thus, the gross profit addition was held to be unsustainable.

To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

StudyCafe Membership

Join StudyCafe Membership. For More details about Membership Click Join Membership Button
Join Membership

In case of any Doubt regarding Membership you can mail us at [email protected]

Join Studycafe's WhatsApp Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Government Job, Sarkari Naukri, Private Jobs, Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"




Author Bio
My Recent Articles
HC Quashes Rs. 30,000 Customs Penalty as Proceedings Invoked Wrong Warehouse Regulations HC: Reopening for Assessment Year Invalid as It Falls Outside 10-Year Limit in Search Cases HC Dismisses Customs Appeal in Gutkha Export Case; No Confiscation When Packaging Uses Biodegradable Plastic High Court Quashes Reopening Notice as Time-Barred After Search Proceedings High Court Quashes Rs. 18 Lakh Penalty for 15-Hour E-Way Bill ExpiryView All Posts