Non-filing of ITR by suppliers does not render purchases bogus: ITAT:

Non-filing of ITR by suppliers does not render purchases bogus: ITAT

Non-filing of ITR by suppliers does not render purchases bogus, when purchases have been substantiated via invoices, GRNs, e-way bills, transport records, bank payments, GST data

ITAT Mumbai Rejects Rs. 25.55 Cr Bogus Purchase Addition in Everest Food Case

authorMeetu KumaridateJan 7, 2026
Last update on Jan 7, 2026
Non-filing of ITR by suppliers does not render purchases bogus: ITAT M/s Everest Food Products Pvt. Ltd., engaged in manufacture and sale of spices under the “Everest” brand, filed its return for AY 2021-22 declaring income of Rs. 517.71 crore. The case was selected for scrutiny on the grounds of substantial purchases from certain suppliers allegedly identified as non-filers or low-turnover entities.
Income Tax Dept Invites Applications for handling tax-related matters: Know How to Apply
The Assessing Officer treated purchases of Rs. 55.55 crore from four suppliers as non-genuine solely because some suppliers had not filed income-tax returns or audited their accounts, and without rejecting the books, applied a gross profit rate of 46%, making an addition of Rs. 25.55 crore. The CIT(A) deleted the addition after noting that the assessee had furnished complete documentary evidence supporting the purchases. Main Issue: Whether purchases can be treated as non-genuine merely because suppliers allegedly failed to file income-tax returns or audit accounts, despite comprehensive documentary evidence and audited books.
Income Tax Rebate Restriction Applies Only to Equity LTCG u/s Section 112A, Not LTCG from debt investments: Rules ITAT
ITAT Held: The ITAT dismissed the Revenue’s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)’s order. It held that non-filing of returns by suppliers, by itself, does not render purchases bogus. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had substantiated the purchases through invoices, GRNs, e-way bills, transport records, bank payments, GST data, and income-tax portal records. The Assessing Officer neither disproved the evidence nor conducted any independent enquiry to establish that the suppliers were accommodation entry providers, nor were corresponding sales disturbed. Thus, the gross profit addition was held to be unsustainable. To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2157
Up Next

Loading suggestions…