Company Fined for Violating Private Placement Share Issue Norms:

This document outlines the appeal process against the ROC penalty for late filing of the Return of Allotment under Section 42(9) of the Companies Act, 2013.
Appeal Against Penalty for Late Filing Under Companies Act

Company Fined for Violating Private Placement Share Issue Norms
This document is a legal order passed by the Regional Director (South East Region) of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, based in Hyderabad, highlighting a case associated with Chalasani Hospitals Private Limited, a private company situated in Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh.
Background of Case
- Chalasani Hospitals Private Limited has filed an appeal along with two individuals, Ms. Vijaya Lakshmi Chalasani and Mr. Saileesh Chalasani. All three individuals are appellants in this case. They are all raising objections to the previous decision.
- The appeal was filed via electronic means, i.e., e-form ADJ on March 31, 2025, under SRN AB3122651 (Under Section 454(5) of the Companies Act, 2013, which permits a company or an individual to raise objections against a penalty order passed by ROC.
- Previously, the Registrar of Companies (ROC), Andhra Pradesh, issued a penalty order (Petition No. PO/ADJ/02-2025/VW/00092) on February 24, 2025. ROC was discovered that the company, i.e., Chalasani Hospitals Pvt. Ltd did not comply to Section 42(9) of the Companies Act, 2013, and hence, imposed a penalty of Rs. 1,80,000, on company and Rs. 1,80,000 on defaulting officer, namely Ms. Vijaya Lakshmi Chalasani, Director and Mr. Saileesh Chalasani, Director (total amount: Rs. 5,40,000).
- Section 42 of the Companies Act deals with private placement of securities, which means offering shares or debentures to a limited number of investors privately (not through a public offering). Under Section 42(9) specifically, whenever a company allots shares through this method, it must file a document called the Return of Allotment (Form PAS-3) with the Registrar of Companies within a specific time limit (usually 15 days from the date of allotment).
- In this case, the company, i.e., Chalasani Hospitals, did not submit this return within the given time period. In conclusion, the ROC imposed a penalty on the company.
- The appellants (the company and the two individuals) were not satisfied with the penalty order of the ROC and hence, filed an appeal in challenge. The hearing was confirmed on May 29, 2025. The company secretary (CS) presented during the case was named Mr. S. Hari Kishore Babu.
- This order document indicates the beginning part of the decision made by the Regional Director (RD). The Director is now reviewing the case and the appeal against the earlier penalty. It mentions that the hearing has taken place, and the next parts of the order would explain the Director’s final decision, whether the penalty is upheld, reduced, or cancelled.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2389My Recent Articles
- ITAT Remands Section 69 Unexplained Cash Credit Addition After Bank Statement Was Not ExaminedPremium
- ITAT Remands Transfer Pricing Dispute: DRP to Reassess Comparables and Working Capital AdjustmentPremium
- CBDT Notifies TDS Exemption on Aircraft Lease Payments to IFSC Units Under 20-Year Tax Deduction Scheme Premium
- CBDT Grants TDS Exemption On Ship Leasing Payments To IFSC Units Under 20-Year Tax Deduction SchemePremium
- ITAT Remands Case to CIT(A) After Admitting Crucial Sale Deed as Additional Evidence
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Tags
Recent Posts

All Posts








