Customs: Delhi High Court Directs Release of Confiscated Gold on Payment of Redemption Fine and Penalty:

Delhi High Court directs Customs to release seized gold to Rakesh Kumar Jat upon payment of fine, penalty, and partial warehousing charges, allowing re-export.
HC Allows Gold Release on Compliance with Customs Order

Customs: Delhi High Court Directs Release of Confiscated Gold on Payment of Redemption Fine and Penalty
An individual named Rakesh Kumar Jat, a citizen of India, lives and works in Kuwait, holds a valid ‘State of Kuwait Civil ID Card,’ and was travelling from Kuwait to New Delhi on April 26, 2024, on flight JE-409. When he arrived at the Indira Gandhi International Airport, New Delhi, a gold item he was carrying, a 64-gram unevenly shaped gold cut piece, was detained by the Customs Department.
Then, he files a writ petition in the Delhi High Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Indian Constitution to challenge an Order-in-Original dated May 27, 2025, passed by the Commissioner of Customs. He also asked the court to order the release of the seized gold.
In the high court, he argued that no show-cause notice (SCN) was issued to him by the authorities before releasing the final order, which is unfair as per the law, as he was not given a fair chance to explain his side before the final decision was made. He also mentioned that he had appointed an authorised representative to speak on his behalf to Customs, but the department did not even allow that representative to act or release the gold based on his authority.
In this context, the Customs Department argued that they were ready to implement the original order dated May 27, 2025. So they were willing to allow the release of the gold if the conditions of that order were followed. The Order-in-Original passed by the Customs Commissioner consisted of four parts:
- Rakesh Kumar Jat was denied the usual allowance because he did not declare the gold either at the Red Channel (for declarations) or the Green Channel (for no declarations). He was found to be carrying the item without informing officials, which is illegal as per the law.
- The gold piece, 64 grams of 999 purity valued at Rs. 4,49,544, was confiscated under multiple sections of the Customs Act, 1962 (Sections 111(d), 111(i), 111(j), and 111(m)) for improper import.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2587My Recent Articles
- Rs 1.48 Crore Interest on Delayed Property Payments Qualifies as Cost of Acquisition: ITAT DelhiPremium
- ROC Penalises Company and Director Rs 20,000 for Wrong AGM Date in Form AOC-4CFSPremium
- ROC Penalises Company's Eight Directors Over Non-Appointment of Two Independent Directors for FY 2015-16 to 2018-19Premium
- An Inadvertent Typographical Error in Tax Audit Report Should Not Lead to An Unmerited Disallowance, Rules ITATPremium
- 21 CBI Officials Honoured With President’s Medals for Distinguished and Meritorious Service on 80th Independence Day
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts







