Delhi HC Cuts TDS to 2% in Software Taxation Dispute; Cites Lack of Reasoning in Section 197 Order:

Delhi HC Cuts TDS to 2% in Software Taxation Dispute; Cites Lack of Reasoning in Section 197 Order

Delhi HC reduced the TDS rate to 2%, holding that the tax authorities must provide proper reasons while issuing withholding certificates in cross-border software transactions.

Delhi High Court Modifies Withholding Certificate

authorSaloni KumaridateMar 3, 2026
Last update on Mar 3, 2026
Delhi HC Cuts TDS to 2% in Software Taxation Dispute; Cites Lack of Reasoning in Section 197 Order The Delhi High Court has announced its final judgement dated February 24, 2026, on a writ petition filed by a non-resident company, DocuSign Inc., against the Income Tax Department, challenging an order dated August 11, 2025, passed by the Office of Circle Int Tax 1(2)(2). Through the impugned order, the tax authorities had issued a certificate under Section 197 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, directing that tax be withheld at 4% on its payments.
Delhi HC Upholds CESTAT Remand in Rs. 3.75 Crore Service Tax Dispute Over Embassy Exemption Claims
The assessee is a software company of the United States of America (USA), with its principal place of business in San Francisco, California, USA. The assessee company provides its services in India through the global distribution arrangements and direct sales arrangements. The company argued that it is a tax resident of the US and that its transactions with Indian customers do not involve royalty or “Fees for Included Services” under the India-USA Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement. It also relied on the Supreme Court’s ruling in Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Ltd v. CIT, which clarified the taxability of software payments. DocuSign contended that the tax authority gave no proper reasons for fixing the 4% rate.
Supreme Court Upholds Chhattisgarh HC Ruling: No TCS on Compounding Fees from Illegal Mining Activities
The tax department argued that the nature of the company’s transactions had not yet been fully examined and that final tax liability would be determined during assessment proceedings. It added that excess tax, if any, could later be refunded. When the High Court analysed the facts of the case, it noted that the tax authorities had not provided adequate reasons in their order. Observing that most of the financial year had already passed and that 4% tax was being deducted, the Court directed the department to issue a revised certificate allowing tax deduction at 2% for Assessment Year 2026-27. The petition was partly allowed, with directions for proper consideration in future years.

About Author

LinkedIn

Saloni Kumari

Content Writer

Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2431
Up Next

Loading suggestions…