Delhi HC Quashes Section 148 Reassessment Notice Issued One Day Late, Says “Generated” Is Not “Issued”:

Delhi HC Quashes Section 148 Reassessment Notice Issued One Day Late, Says “Generated” Is Not “Issued”

The Delhi High Court quashed a reassessment notice sent one day late, ruling that a notice is valid only when actually issued, not merely generated on the portal.

HC Rules Revenue Cannot Blame Portal Glitches for Delayed Notice

authorSaloni KumaridateNov 25, 2025
Last update on Nov 25, 2025
Delhi HC Quashes Section 148 Reassessment Notice Issued One Day Late, Says “Generated” Is Not “Issued” The Delhi High Court, in a recent case, has quashed an income tax reassessment notice, noticing that the notice was not issued within a statutory time limit; instead, only generated online at the income tax portal. Set aside the notice as it reached the assessee late by one day. The writ petition had been filed by Grid Solutions SAS in the Delhi High Court. In the present case, the notice under sections 148A and 148 was successfully generated and signed by the income tax department within the statutory deadline, on June 30, 2025; however, it was received by the assessee on July 01, 2025, which is beyond the legal deadline for initiating reassessment proceedings.
Gujarat High Court Quashes 153C Notices Issued After 22-Month Delay in Recording Satisfaction
At the time of personal hearing, the income tax department admitted its mistake that the notice was successfully generated at 21:14:46 and digitally signed on June 30, 2025; however, it could not reach the assessee on time, due to technical glitches in the e-filing portal. The notice was uploaded on the portal at 00:48 am on July 01, 2025, and was also emailed to the assessee separately on July 01, 2025, at 09:18 am. In the court, the authorised representative of the assessee argued that the notice is not acceptable as it is time-barred, according to the initial proceedings, its limitation had expired on June 30, 2025, only. Issuance of notice under sections 148A and 148 after this date makes it invalid.
Delhi Police Unearths Rs. 1.6 Crore Pan-India Stock Market Investment Fraud; 3 Individuals Arrested
To announce its final decision, the high court cited its earlier judgment titled Suman Jeet Agarwal v. ITO, where it was ruled that a notice is considered “issued” only when it is actually sent out. So, even if the notice was prepared earlier, if it was sent after the deadline, it will not count as issued on time. The court further ruled that the revenue cannot merely rely on internal software delays to justify late issuance, as if the e-filing portal is not working properly, it is also attributable to the income tax department itself.
CGST Chennai Unearths Rs. 34.81 Crore Massive GST Evasion; Copper Firm MD Arrested
The high court noted that the reassessment notice for the assessment year 2019-20 was sent to the assessee only on July 01, 2025; hence held that the initiation of proceedings was barred by limitation and quashed the impugned notice dated June 30, 2025, issued under section 148. Meaning, the appeal has been allowed, and the final decision has been announced in favour of the assessee.

About Author

Saloni Kumari

Content Writer

Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2389
Up Next

Loading suggestions…