Delhi HC Sets Aside Ex-Parte GST Demand; Remands Matter Amid Pending SC Challenge:

Delhi HC Sets Aside Ex-Parte GST Demand; Remands Matter Amid Pending SC Challenge

Court Grants Fresh Opportunity to File Reply and Hearing in GST Case, Subject to Outcome of Supreme Court on Validity of Notification No. 56/2023

HC Remands Ex-Parte GST Order Amid Pending SC Ruling on Section 168A

authorMeetu KumaridateDec 20, 2025
Last update on Dec 20, 2025
Delhi HC Sets Aside Ex-Parte GST Demand; Remands Matter Amid Pending SC Challenge M/s Gupta Sanitation challenged an ex-parte adjudication order dated 18.04.2024 and the show cause notice dated 04.12.2023 for the period April 2018 to March 2019. The petitioner also questioned the validity of Notification No. 56/2023–Central Tax extending the limitation under Section 168A of the CGST Act, an issue already pending before the Supreme Court.
SC Declares Appellate Decree a Nullity; Allows Execution of Trial Court’s Order in Land Allotment Case
The petitioner contended he had not filed a reply or appeared for a personal hearing, as the notices were uploaded only under the “Additional Notices” tab on the GST portal and were not effectively communicated. Main Issue: Whether the ex-parte GST adjudication order deserved to be set aside and remanded for fresh consideration, pending final adjudication by the Supreme Court on the validity of Notification No. 56/2023–Central Tax.
SC Declares Appellate Decree a Nullity; Allows Execution of Trial Court’s Order in Land Allotment Case
HC's Ruling: The High Court set aside the impugned adjudication order and remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority. The Court held that the petitioner had not been afforded a proper opportunity to file a reply or be heard, and principles of natural justice required that such an opportunity be granted, especially when the challenge to the impugned notification was still pending before the Supreme Court. The remand was made subject to payment of costs of Rs. 10,000 to the Delhi High Court Staff Welfare Fund. The petitioner was granted time until 15.01.2026 to file a reply to the show cause notice. The adjudicating authority was directed to grant a personal hearing and thereafter pass a fresh, reasoned order. The Court held that all issues were left open and any fresh order would be subject to the outcome of the pending Supreme Court proceedings. To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2157
Up Next

Loading suggestions…