Director Escapes Penalty Due to Death, But ROC fines Company for Non-Compliance:

ROC Ahmedabad imposes a penalty on the company and its directors under Section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013, for Violation of Section 172 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Penalty Imposed on Milcent Appliances Private Limited for Companies Act Violation

Director Escapes Penalty Due to Death, But ROC fines Company for Non-Compliance
The Registrar of Companies (ROC) Ahmedabad under the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA), Government of India, has an Order for Adjudication (Order ID: PO/ADJ/08-2025/AD/00583), dated August 12, 2025, imposing penalty on Milcent Appliances Private Limited and its directors under Section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013 (‘The Act’) for Violation of Section 172 of the Companies Act, 2013.
A. Appointment of Adjudicating Officer
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA), through its Gazette notification number S.O. 831(E) dated 24/03/2015, has made the appointment of an Adjudicating Officer under Section 454 and the Companies (Adjudication of Penalties) Rules, 2014. This officer has the power to examine the case and decide penalties for violations of the Companies Act.
B. Details of the Company and Individuals
The name of the company is Milcent Appliances Private Limited, possessing CIN: U32201GJ1987PTC010122. The company's office is located on the 8th Floor, Shaligram Corporates, C J Marg, Ambli, Ahmedabad, Gujarat - 380058.
Individuals involved:
This matter is related to an individual named Rohitkumar Jashbhai Patel, possessing DIN: 00088482. The individual resides at Gargi Bunglow, Bh. Atit Bunglow, Gargi Bunglow, Bh. Atit Bunglow, Anand, Gujarat, India, 388325.
This matter is related to an individual named Jayshreeben Patel Rohitkumar, possessing DIN: 00868474. The individual resides at Gargi Bunglows, B/H Atit Bunglow Karamsad, Gargi Bunglows, B/H Atit Bunglow Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat, India 388325.
These individuals were officers of the company and are responsible for certain defaults.
C. Relevant Law
According to the Companies Act, if a company or its officers fail to obey any rules where no specific penalty is mentioned, they can be fined:
Filing Appeal
Any appeal can be filed in writing to the Regional Director, RD Ahmedabad, within 60 days of receipt of the order using Form ADJ, along with a certified copy of this order. Non-payment within the prescribed time may lead to penal consequences as per Section 454(8) of the Companies Act.
F. Recipients of the Order
- Company: Rs. 50,000, and if the failure continues, Rs. 500 per day (maximum Rs. 300,000).
- Officers in default: Rs. 50,000, and if the failure continues, Rs. 500 per day (maximum Rs. 100,000).
|
Person |
Rectification of Default | Penalty Amount | Additional Penalty per day | Maximum Limit |
| Milcent Appliances Pvt Ltd | - | Rs. 1,50,000 | ₹0 |
Rs. 3,00,000 |
|
Rohitkumar Jashbhai Patel |
- | Rs. 0 | ₹0 | Rs. 1,00,000 |
| Jayshreeben Patel Rohitkumar | - | Rs. 50,000 | ₹0 |
Rs. 1,00,000 |
- Milcent Appliances Pvt Ltd – Email: [email protected]
- Rohitkumar Jashbhai Patel – Email: [email protected]
- Jayshreeben Patel Rohitkumar – Email: [email protected]
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2702My Recent Articles
- ITAT Condoned Delay After Noting Indeed Technical Glitch on E-filing Portal and Restores Section 12A and 80G ApplicationsPremium
- ITAT Rejects Section 69A Unexplained Money Addition Based on Alleged Over-Invoicing Entry Found in Third-Party SearchPremium
- ITAT Condoned 336-Day Delay in Section 68 Case After Taxpayer Cites Lack Of Online Communication AwarenessPremium
- United Breweries Secures Full Relief from Bombay High Court in Rs 21.92 Crore Service Tax Dispute
- Aries Agro Faces Rs 3.96 Crore GST Demand Over ITC Availment from Retrospectively Cancelled Vendors
Up Next
Loading suggestions…









