Exposed: Income Tax Redressal System Sends Copy-Paste Replies to Serious Complaints:

A test grievance filed with the Income Tax Department reveals flaws in the redressal system, highlighting automated responses and a lack of human review.
Taxpayer's Test Complaint Highlights Automated, Ignored Responses

Exposed: Income Tax Redressal System Sends Copy-Paste Replies to Serious Complaints
A taxpayer filed a test grievance on July 5, 2025, with the Acknowledgement Number 21925231. The reason for this test was to examine whether the Income Tax Department's online grievance redressal system is functioning properly or simply issuing automated replies.
In that grievance, the taxpayer clearly mentioned that this is a test ticket meant to see if someone genuinely reads what is written. However, despite that, the Income Tax Department closed the grievance on July 7, 2025, and marked it as "RESOLVED."
What Was Their Response? They gave taxpayers a generic, copy-paste response, which reads as follows: “Dear taxpayer, We are still checking the information you submitted in response to a communication (probably a notice or defect in return) for your Income Tax Return for AY 2024-25. If you already filed a revised return, we will process it based on certain rules, checks, and system validations. We will send you an update to your registered email once this processing is complete.” Why This Is a Problem@nsitharaman @narendramodi A Test Ticket was raised, the Income Tax Department closed it as well with the same generic copy-paste response, without even reading it. This reflects a clear failure of the grievance redressal system #incometaxindia #Government #supportissue #Tax pic.twitter.com/HSR54T3cdm
— Rajesh Khatri (@RajeshKhatri80) July 7, 2025
- The taxpayer's test was to check if anyone actually reads the grievance before replying.
- However, the reply he received did not address what he wrote at all.
- Instead, they just gave a pre-drafted, copy-paste message, which they seem to use for many taxpayers.
- This clearly indicates that either the grievance redressal system is fully automated, or no human is reviewing the grievances carefully.
- Even when the taxpayer made it obvious that this was a test to check responsiveness, they did not notice and still gave a generic reply.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2702My Recent Articles
- ITAT Condoned Delay After Noting Indeed Technical Glitch on E-filing Portal and Restores Section 12A and 80G ApplicationsPremium
- ITAT Rejects Section 69A Unexplained Money Addition Based on Alleged Over-Invoicing Entry Found in Third-Party SearchPremium
- ITAT Condoned 336-Day Delay in Section 68 Case After Taxpayer Cites Lack Of Online Communication AwarenessPremium
- United Breweries Secures Full Relief from Bombay High Court in Rs 21.92 Crore Service Tax Dispute
- Aries Agro Faces Rs 3.96 Crore GST Demand Over ITC Availment from Retrospectively Cancelled Vendors
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Tags
Recent Posts
All Posts









