False Accusation Exposed: Centre Did Not Use Compensation Cess for Its Own Debt:

The Finance Ministry firmly denies claims that the Centre misused Compensation Cess, clarifying it was collected only for states and for repaying GST Council-approved COVID-related borrowings.
Centre Demands Withdrawal of False and Baseless Accusation

False Accusation Exposed: Centre Did Not Use Compensation Cess for Its Own Debt
The Ministry of Finance has several times informed that Compensation Cess was collected for a duration of five years, only to give the amount to the states. After this duration of five years, it was supposed to end.
The officials of the finance ministry are strongly criticising the claim that the Centre is using the Compensation Cess to repay its own loans. This is not true.
The Compensation Cess is collected with the approval of the GST council for the purpose of repaying credits taken during the period of the COVID-19 pandemic by the government, which ultimately affected their revenue collection during the period.
The officials are shocked that the constitutional body, comprised of finance ministers of all states, would ever allow them to use the Compensation Cess to pay the central government’s own debts. Unless the Hon’ble MP Shri Sasikanth Senthil believes that all these finance ministers are unaware or unable to question me.
The MP should withdraw his incorrect and baseless accusation.
It has been clarified many times that the Compensation Cess was collected for a period of five years for the purpose of giving it to the states, and that after five years it was to conclude.
I must also express my serious objection to the observation that the Compensation Cess… pic.twitter.com/5yzrhJKG2T — Nirmala Sitharaman Office (@nsitharamanoffc) December 3, 2025
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2702My Recent Articles
- ITAT Condoned Delay After Noting Indeed Technical Glitch on E-filing Portal and Restores Section 12A and 80G ApplicationsPremium
- ITAT Rejects Section 69A Unexplained Money Addition Based on Alleged Over-Invoicing Entry Found in Third-Party SearchPremium
- ITAT Condoned 336-Day Delay in Section 68 Case After Taxpayer Cites Lack Of Online Communication AwarenessPremium
- United Breweries Secures Full Relief from Bombay High Court in Rs 21.92 Crore Service Tax Dispute
- Aries Agro Faces Rs 3.96 Crore GST Demand Over ITC Availment from Retrospectively Cancelled Vendors
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts









