Franchise fees paid to BCCI Not Capital Expenditure; ITAT Grants Relief for Multiple Years:

Franchise fees allowed as deduction; Revenue appeals dismissed across multiple assessment years.
Tribunal follows earlier decisions in assessee’s own case.

Franchise fees paid to BCCI Not Capital Expenditure; ITAT Grants Relief for Multiple Years
The assessee, M/s Indiawin Sports Pvt. Ltd., runs its business through owning and running the Mumbai IPL team. In respect of AYs 2016–17, 2017–18, and 2018–19, the AO disallowed the deduction in respect of franchise fees paid to BCCI for playing in the IPL, treating them as capital expenditure. Further, 10% of the expense on hospitality was disallowed on an ad hoc basis.
Before the CIT(A), the disallowances made in the income tax assessment order were deleted based on the earlier decisions of the tribunal in the same assessee’s case that franchise fees would be treated as revenue expenditure and hospitality expenses would be business expenses.
Central Issue: Whether franchise fees paid to BCCI for IPL participation are capital or revenue expenditure?
Tribunal's Ruling: All appeals preferred by the Revenue have been dismissed. As per the binding precedent in the present case, the Tribunal found that the franchise fees charged by the assessee are revenue in nature. Mere pendency of an appeal before the High Court cannot detract from the binding nature of coordinate benches' decisions.
As regards hospitality expenditure, it is well settled that there could be no ad-hoc disallowance where the expenses are clearly attributable to business operations. Since identical disallowances were set aside in earlier years and no special circumstances were proved, the deletion of the same by CIT(A) has been found justifiable. Thus, all appeals preferred by the Revenue in the Assessment Years 2016–17, 2017–18, and 2018–19 have been dismissed.
To Read Full Order, Download PDF Given Below.
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2176My Recent Articles
- ITAT Holds Receivables Discounting Charges Not Liable to TDS Under Section 194APremium
- ITAT Allows Genuine Tax Planning, Deletes Rs.258 Crore Section 68 AdditionPremium
- ITAT Quashes Time-Barred Reassessment Notice Issued Beyond Six-Year LimitationPremium
- ITAT Deletes Rs 25.12 Crore Disallowance on Independent Section 36 Deduction ComputationPremium
- ITAT Pune Quashes Reassessment as Notice u/s 148A(d) Travelled Beyond Original AllegationsPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








